Why Snohomish County Prosecutor should be Recalled

Snohomish County Washington Executive employee Kevin ( now using Kevin Thomas) Hulten was exposed by two Snohomish County reporters from the Snohomish County Daily Herald on February 14, 2014, for harassing Snohomish County resident and taxpayer Anne Block.

http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20130214/NEWS01/702149999

Snohomish County Executive Aaron Reardon resigned as a result, and Snohomish County executive employee Kevin Thomas Hulten was terminated from Snohomish County employment for misconduct. His claim for unemployment was denied as a result of his misconduct.

In March 2014, the Snohomish County council ordered the criminal investigation as outlined by the Snohomish County Daily Herald’s article “Reardon’s Office linked to harassment” to the King County Major Crimes Unit.  Kevin Hulten’s county computers and cell phone were transferred to King County Major Crimes Unit for forensic inspection.

According to King County’s Major Crimes Unit, Kevin Hulten used a “wiping program” and destroyed evidence.  Upon completion of its investigation, King County Major Crimes Unit transferred its criminal investigation to Skagit County for possible prosecution. Skagit County brought criminal evidence tampering charges against Kevin Hulten, and Kevin Hulten plead GUILTY in an open public court located in Arlington, Washington, to criminal evidence tampering on July 7, 2014.

In August 2014, Snohomish County Prosecutor Mark Roe violated RCW 4.96.010 when he allocated and entered into an agreement using Snohomish County taxpayer monies to fund Kevin Thomas Hulten a convicted criminal and former Snohomish County Executive employee Kevin Hulten.

RCW 4.96.010 in pertinent part prohibits use of taxpayer funds for conduct outside of the employee’s official duties and states the following:

Tortious conduct of local governmental entities — Liability for damages.

(1) All local governmental entities, whether acting in a governmental or proprietary capacity, shall be liable for damages arising out of their tortious conduct, or the tortious conduct of their past or present officers, employees, or volunteers while performing or in good faith purporting to perform their official duties, to the same extent as if they were a private person or corporation. Filing a claim for damages within the time allowed by law shall be a condition precedent to the commencement of any action claiming damages. The laws specifying the content for such claims shall be liberally construed so that substantial compliance therewith will be deemed satisfactory.

Looks to those us open government supporters in Snohomish County, Washington, that Prosecutor Mark Roe was involved in the facade that Aaron Reardon, Kevin Hulten and Jo Rudicil created by requesting records anonmously in the County’s efforts to change the Public Records Act.

Soon the voters will be the deciders as to whether or not Snohomish County Prosecutor Mark Roe will be Recalled or not.

Trackbacks

  1. […] it seems that Ms Block has filed a recall petition for the Snohomish County Prosecutor but of course the local paper did not report it, they will only report it if it fails so they can […]

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: