King County Prosecutor’s cover up as “risk management”

For those of you that haven’t been reading the Gold Bar Reporter’s reports on King County’s racketeering scheme, using animal abuse cases to trump up criminal charges on honest hard working citizens, you should read the following links:

https://goldbarreporter.org/2016/06/13/dont-open-the-barn-door/

In 2012, Jason Markley, made one major mistake, he trusted his lawyer, Kevin Tarvin. In a past article, the Gold Bar Reporter wrote extensively on how Washington State attorney Kevin Tarvin threw his client under the bus, presumably as a political favor to lead Prosecutor Gretchen Holmgren. Ms. Holmgren is the daughter of former Superbowl Seahawks coach, Mike Holmgren.

https://goldbarreporter.org/category/king-county-animal-abuse-scam-biling-taxpayers/


King County animal control officer Jenee Westberg’s fixation on Jason  Markley grew through 2014.  Worst part is King County Prosecutor’s Office knew Jenee Westberg was a convicted criminal and drug addict, but King County Prosecutor’s Office withheld that information because she was the lead witness in the majority of their 23 phony animal abuse cases.

Imagine, King County hires a career criminal, uses her in at least 23 phony animal abuse cases, and then, in violation of Brady v. Maryland, King County Prosecutor’s Office intentionally withholds material evidence.  Isn’t that criminal on its face?  By the very people who are supposed to prosecute the criminals.

Material evidence withheld includes, but is not limited to, these facts: Westberg is a convicted criminal for illegal possession of a controlled substance (police reports indicate that she was trafficking horse tranquilizers as well) caught trying to bribe a police officer after she was caught shop lifting at K-Mart, caught with counterfeit money, and had four extensive disciplinary proceedings (called “Loudermill” hearings) while employed at King County.

In 2001, early in Westberg’s career, she was the named prime suspect in her supervisor’s report to law enforcement of stealing gas on King County’s gas credit card.  Westberg worked for King County Parks at the time.  Westberg was let go.

Then King County hired her back a year and a half later.  (No doubt her mother helped that along.  Ann Westberg had both Jenee and Desiree (2009) on King County payrolls at times).

Illegal credit card theft seems to come up significantly in her police events.  And in fact it is part of the embezzlement we have uncovered but we’ll save that for another story.

After Jason Markley was thrown under the bus by attorney Kevin Tarvin, Markley was stalked at his home by whom he has ample reason to believe  was Jenee Westberg.

Markley had dead rats bludgeoned to death on the kitchen floor and their bloody bodies left in the toilet inside his home – on that breach – all the keys were missing as well as all their spoons – a drug addict crime to be sure.  The place reeked of cigarette smoke (Westberg smokes).

Super-glue was poured in the door locks, then the gate lock and repeated – straight from the Animal Liberation Rights (ALF – domestic terrorists) handbook.

Markley’s car had been tampered with multiple times, the lug nuts on the wheels of his car had been loosened causing one of the wheels to come flying off while driving.  The oil had been drained numerous times from his vehicles where the last time he was on HWY 18 with his children in the car and the engine seized.  This was a near miss with two semi trucks.

Auburn Police would claim the cars were not well cared for though they had the vehicle report in hand.  Mechanical examination confirmed no oil leak and no burning of oil with both computer readouts and visual examination.  No leak or burning since either.

Property at Markley’s home had been destroyed, four new lawn mowers – one at a time – stopped working after the first use.  There were spontaneous flat tires with roofer nails.

Markley’s property, at 105 feet from the gun discharge was just 25 feet from the bullet.   Markley’s 4 children were quietly studying in their home at the time.  The shot came from an Elk gun designed to take down an elk at up to three miles –  a 7mm Browning scoped rifle.   It was in the direction, 2,500 feet from two public schools.  APD Officer Adamski not only failed to put the schools on lock down, but he failed to arrest the gunman and confiscate any of the arms.

Did the Auburn Police Department act to prosecute?  No.

Markley diligently reported all these events as they occurred to the Auburn Police. They did not act to investigate for all his trouble except to profile his children.

After around ten times, Markley escalated his complaints.  He filed a criminal complaint of serial vandalism and attempted manslaughter.  At this point, the Auburn Police had to at least ACT like they were doing something even though they ended up protecting Westberg in the end right along with King County.

Jason Markley had no doubt that Jenee Westberg was responsible, because by this time, he started to piece Jenee Westberg’s criminal history together by gaining access to pubic records from local police departments directly.  Yes it is clear, Ms. Westberg has quite the criminal career going on, over 45 police events.  It appears she was afforded professional courtesy extensively.

Jenee Westberg also learned around the same time that Markley had teamed up with an investigative journalist who was also researching the phony prosecutions. From here, Jenee Westberg’s criminal conduct while inside King County’s Animal Control Office became nakedly exposed via public records requests ( RCW 42.56) of over 30,000 documents and two rather extensive Public Records Act litigations.  It is still pending – largely for King County’s bad faith in withholding public records – and keeping their victims crippled with false prosecutions – see Joshua Frost case and 9th District court scathing response naming Dan Satterberg and Kelli Williams.

King County continued to suppress Westberg’s nefarious criminal activities but at the last – her public persona was exposing too much King County – it appeared they were intent on quietly giving her the boot… without telling anyone… including all the wrongfully prosecuted innocent people she had set up for complete ruin.  Even Westberg was surprised.  After all, she was doing what they all taught her.

In fact, one of Westberg’s co-conspirator buddies, King County Sheriff Major Crimes Deputy Robin Cleary, was being investigated and going out the back door at the same time.  She was just as shocked as Westberg.

Cleary helped Westberg fabricate evidence against their innocent victims often.  In Markley’s case – she was only 4 hours away that day terrorizing the Lindsey’s with ACO Dave Morris and Jenee Westberg before Jenee would make her first contact on April 8th, 2011 at Markley’s.

No one at King County disclosed either of these women were terminated, for turpitude cause or that they were even being investigated while two victims were attempting to gain some traction at the Court of Appeals Div I.

Both Westberg and Cleary made KCDPA Chief Dan Clark’s “Brady Officer” lists.  However, they were placed on two different years (one month apart) so as not to draw too much attention.

The last time I checked, a prosecutor concealing “exculpatory” evidence (evidence that tends to support the defendant’s innocence) is a crime and criminal.  In fact, I believe they call that “RICO” or racketeering.

Case in point –  and the whole point of the above discussion is below.  It is how King County responsed to a criminal complaint filed against Jenee Westberg by Jason Markley in Auburn Washington.

After reading the email chain, our hope is that our readers say ” what the Hell is King County doing advising a King County employee on fighting off a criminal charge or even assisting her with a restraining order against a citizen who is simply filing a criminal complaint for property damages?”

Sadly, Jenee Westberg’s racketeering has led to phony felony convictions in at least fifteen animal abuse cases.  And she had help – lots of it.  As of today, we know of 23 cases, but there could be more.

The Honorable Justice Alex Kozinski, you were right, King County is intentionally withholding evidence to ensure convictions, just as in the Joshua Frost case.”
_______________________________________________

This is the final conclusion of 10 days worth of drama that Jenee Westberg, her mother, Ann Westberg, and King County Deputy Prosecutor Nancy Balin conspired together in order to protect Jenee Westberg from Jason Markley’s  legitimate criminal complaint of serial vandalism that named Jenee Westberg as the primary suspect.

 These are alleged criminal activities Ms. Westberg would have implemented while she was off duty.  (Certainly not the first time.  We have found at least 45.)

This email string was received via a public records request to King County. The emails show King County Deputy Prosecutor Nancy Balin helping  Jenee Westberg discredit Jason Markley’s criminal complaint.

At the time of the alleged criminal complaints, Jenee Westberg was off duty. It exposes Jenee Westberg’s mother, Ann Westberg assisting Jenee and Balin.

Ann Westberg is the executive Level V assistant to King County Deputy Chief Prosecutor, Dan Clark, Criminal Division, RJC in Kent. (Clark also chairs the “Brady Committee” that designats officer’s credibility for a witness under oath.  A “Brady Officer” is not trustworthy).

Washington State’s Constitution prohibits use of public resources for personal reasons.   But Jenee Westberg seems to be the exception, even though at the time of this email, she had been disciplined for falsifying time sheets with King County (third Loudermill).  And she was beginning the investigation (fourth Loudermill) of what she would be ultimately terminated for a year later.   (Falsifying her animal control reports and theft of county time).

The email thread starts at the end  and works back to the beginning of the event.

READ ON:
__________________________________________
From: Hagen, Brittany
Sent: Monday,  November 25, 2013 4:50 PM
To: Drangsholt, Tim Cc: Anderson, Tim; Mueller, Gene; Watson, Seth; Pedersen, Megan; Kalina, Lynne
Subject: RE: Westberg, J

Good Afternoon,

I spoke with Officer E. Wickman The Auburn Police Department.  He stated he “saw no plausible threat to her, nor did he indicate a threat to her.”  He “doesn’t think that there is a credible threat to her at this time.”  He believes “he is not really the type of person who would be a credible threat” (meaning Markley). Wickman only wanted to notify Ms. Westberg “that she was propagated to be subject, and that he didn’t find anything.”  Nancy is helping Janee in working on a no contact order.  We will work to get the MOU to order and fit vests as soon as possible.

Let me know if there are questions or concerns.

Thanks,

Brittany Hagen Crosser, PHR
Senior Human Resource Analyst
Department of Executive Services
Ph: 206-296-5172
Fax: 206-296-3904
_______________________________________________________________

 

Westberg never did get a bullet proof vest.

From: Hagen, Brittany
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 1:59 PM
To: Drangsholt, Tim Cc: Anderson, Tim; Mueller, Gene; Watson, Seth; Pedersen, Megan
Subject: Westberg, J

Hi Tim,

I wanted to follow-up on our conversation regarding Ms. Westberg declining placement in the shelter until a bullet proof vest could be purchased and fit to her.  I left a message for the officer who completed the police report we were provided to determine if he agreed with our threat assessment and or if he had further information we would need.  The operator who answered the non-emergency number was unsure of how long it might take for E. Wickman to return my call.  I will let you know when I hear from him.

Thanks,

Brittany Hagen Crosser, PHR
Senior Human Resource Analyst
Department of Executive Services
Ph: 206-296-5172
Fax: 206-296-3904

____________________________________________________________

Even Shelby Miklethun, who has participated in the suppression of public records like and with Kelli Williams, is suspicious.  She produced the emails.

Miklethun, Shelby
From: Wyss, Pamela
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 3:52 PM
To: Hagen Crosser, Brittany
Subject: RE: urgent please read immediately

That’s kind of interesting. Perhaps she is not.

_____________________________________________________________

Brittany Hagen Crosser, Westberg’s investigator on the third and fourth Loudermills, is also suspicious.

Based on review of Westberg’s GPS activity, it appears Jenee cannot afford to give up her extra-curricular distribution route (which employs her taxpayer paid RASKC truck) in lieu of a desk job.

From: Hagen, Brittany
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 3:51 PM
To: Wyss, Pamela
Subject: RE: urgent please read immediately

Not really, but we offered her shelter rather than field work and she denied the transfer, so I’m assuming she’s not that afraid?

Brittany Hagen Crosser, PHR
Senior Human Resource Analyst
Department of Executive Services
Ph: 206-296-5172
Fax: 206-296-3904

_____________________________________________________________

Here it is clear Pamela Wyss continues to be suspicious.

From: Wyss, Pamela
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 3:50 PM
To: Hagen, Brittany
Subject: RE: urgent please read immediately

Okay Brittany, thanks. Was she doing any better?

_____________________________________________________________

On 11/21/2013 at 10:43 AM, while Westberg is being internally investigated by Brittany Hagen Crosser for Westberg’s third “Loudermill” (and starting Westberg’s fourth Loudermill) on completely unrelated turpitude issues, Hagen interviews Westberg about the unrelated Auburn serial vandalism case.  That interview is below with corrections based on public records.

Westberg had to spontaneously mention that Markley had alleged she threatened him with a gun she doesn’t carry.   (Westberg was accused of using this kind of “muscle” in two other cases – both of which got dismissed).  Westberg describes how she knows Markley as someone whom in the course of her employment she cited for animal abuse.

At the end of the interview, Westberg expresses some concern that Markley may find the interview through public records. (He did).

Then she suddenly volunteers that:

 Her sister just purchased the house across the street from Markley in April. She has probably been to her sister’s home about 10 times.”

Westberg’s sister does NOT own – nor did she ever “purchase” any “house across the street from Markley in April (2013).”

However, Jenee had just bought a house herself about 5 miles away from Markley in April 2013.

There also is NO street. The assess is the third leg of an easement that is an undeveloped dirt road. It is also a dead end so there is no driving by Markley’s.

Westberg then admits that “she has probably been… (by Markley’s property)….about 10 times = about the same amount of times Markley alleges he was vandalized – the last – draining the oil (no leak = documented) from the family van, resulting in the engine seizing at 60 mph nearly causing what would surely would have been a fatal accident.

_____________________________________________________________

Gene Mueller (Director of Regional Animal Services of King County) grants permission for government attorney Nancy Balin to represent Westberg, an authority he cannot give, IE, he does not have the authority to break State law under RCW 36.27.060

From: Westberg, Jenee
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 9:00 AM
To: Mueller, Gene
Cc: Balin, Nancy
Subject: RE: question

Thank you Gene
____________________________________________________________ 

From: Mueller, Gene
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 4:59 PM
To: Westberg, Jenee Cc: Anderson, Tim; Russell, Shelby; Balin, Nancy; Hagen, Brittany
Subject: RE: question

Yes, Nancy can assist you.

Gene E. Mueller, DVM

Sent from mobile phone

___________________________________________________________

Below Westberg is admitting she already met with Balin and that Nancy Balin has done nothing to disclose to anyone that she is barred by law as a government attorney to represent Westberg privately on King County’s dime.  (This is a topic Balin is very familiar with because she has had a WA State Bar Assoc. complaint for the same violation filed against her a year earlier).

——– Original message ——–
From: “Westberg, Jenee” <Jenee.Westberg@kingcounty.gov>
Date: 11/21/2013 15:16 (GMT-08:00)
To: “Mueller, Gene” <Gene.Mueller@kingcounty.gov>
Cc: “Anderson, Tim” <Tim.Anderson@kingcounty.gov>,”Russell, Shelby” <Shelby.Russell@kingcounty.gov>
Subject: question

Gene,

Hello. While I was downtown today for BOA I had an opportunity to meet with Nancy Balin. Nancy stated that she would b e happy to represent me and assist me in obtaining an anti harassment order but she would need your approval to do so. Nancy agrees that it is a good idea to move forward with such actions a.s.a.p. and she is available to help out on that right away again she just needs the go ahead from you.

Thank you,

Jenee Westberg
Animal Control Officer #47
Regional Animal Services of King County
21615 64th ave s
Kent, Wa. 98032
Cell (206) 214-8388
Fax (206) 205-8043
____________________________________________________________

Even after a “third review” Pamela Wyss is never quite convinced of Westberg’s claims though she is the one who is in charge of PTSD with King County employees.

From: Wyss, Pamela
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 6:55 AM
To: Teply, Stephen; Drangsholt, Tim
Cc: Hagen, Brittany; Watson, Seth; Kalina, Lynne
Subject: RE: urgent please read immediately

After a third review of all this documentation I still do not see where Mr. Markley is making any direct or implied threats against ACO Jenee Westberg. It is understandable that she would be concerned about his allegations of plotting to murder him but there is no evidence that he is threatening to do anything to her (other than “investigate” her). While I am willing to meet with her to talk about this (though she may not agree with my perspective) at this time I do not have any additional recommendations to make beyond those made by Stephen.

Pam
____________________________________________________________

Westberg is documented getting counsel from Balin (and her agreeing) first thing after Auburn Police Department Det. Wickman has contacted her.

From: Balin, Nancy
To: Westberg, Jenee
Subject: RE: GOOD MORNING
Date: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 9:09:54 AM

Send it on over. I’m at Harborview until 11 and have some noon meetings but am clearer this afternoon.

____________________________________________________________

Westberg admits she has already “talked” to Balin, no doubt Balin concocted the email blast Westberg sent on November 20, 2011 at 2:49PM.  Balin states she is available later on that day. This was a day before Gene Mueller gave his misguided “permission” for Nancy Balin to represent Westberg.

From: Westberg, Jenee
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:19 AM
To: Balin, Nancy
Subject: GOOD MORNING

Hello Nancy,

I need to talk with you again. I received the police report from Auburn and there is a lot of concerning information in it which really has me in fear and other allegations regarding the prosecutor’s office altering documentation etc. I would like for you to either allow me to read it or send it over to you so you can review yourself to help me in figuring out what to do next.

Thank you in advance for your time,

Jenee Westberg
Animal Control Officer #47
Regional Animal Services of King County
21615 64th ave s
Kent, Wa. 98032
Cell (206) 214-8388
Fax (206) 205-8043

____________________________________________________________

Pamela Wyss is not convinced.

From: Wyss, Pamela
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 5:32 PM
To: Drangsholt, Tim; Teply, Stephen
Cc: Hagen, Brittany; Watson, Seth
Subject: RE: urgent please read immediately

I’ll re-read all of this tomorrow but after a first run-through (including the police report) I do not see where Mr. Markley is making any threats, direct or implied. Am I missing something?

Not saying we should not invest in the bullet-proof vest or take other precautions but as of this point I don’t see a viable threat per se.

Pam

____________________________________________________________ 

Here is the review of the crescendo of Westberg’s bait’n switched “truth.” No doubt authored by Nancy Balin for Jenee Westberg.

 This is the outline:

 1) Wednesday, November 20, 2013 – five days after the Auburn Police Dept. “professional courtesy” call – Jenee pens an account – an account that confesses that she is capitalizing on her mother (and her position in the prosecutor’s office), Ann Westberg, who works for the King County Deputy Chief Prosecutor Dan Clark, chair of the “Brady Committee” that did not make Jenee a Brady officer in 2008, when she plead guilty and was convicted for a 19-county VUSCA arrest.

 2) Westberg claims that APD Det. Wickman told her to “watch her back” words that Wickmen would later deny.

 3) Westberg denies the allegations made while she fails to tell Det. Wickman that she is under investigation for her third Loudermill where she currently was awaiting sanctions and beginning the fourth “Loudermill” that ultimately results in her termination a year later for falsifying her animal control reports and theft of county time.

 4) He has contacted 3 other individuals – 2 of which also have animal cruelty convictions 1st and 2nd degree.  The 3rd person was Laurie Hart whose case was “still pending” and had not been convicted at this time (largely because other victims exposed Westberg’s criminal career.  Hart’s case was dismissed two years later due to massive exposed “Brady” violations by Gretchen Holmgren).

Those “3 other individuals” would likely be Markley, Lindsey, and Diemond.   It was Diemond who contacted Markley and Thomas – not the other way around.  She had been on the scent the moment Westberg and her co-conspirators showed up.

Laurie Hart was discovered through court records. Because of Markley and Diemond’s investigations, her case would result in a dismissal two years later.

 5) “I went to the court house yesterday and got the paperwork for an anti harassment order, I would rather have a protection order but since Markley hasn’t directly contacted me I’m not eligible. The harassment order is $93.00 which I don’t feel that I should have to pay out of my own personal pocket. I have sent the police report to Nancy Balin for her to review and I would like to request that she represent me and assist me in the filing of this paperwork. I would also like to request that the county purchase me a bullet proof vest immediately.

 a) Westberg may have gotten paperwork but she admits she could NOT have gotten an anti harassment order as there were NO grounds.  Westberg was never eligible for either an anti harassment order nor a protection order because Markley never threatened her. He just simply named her a person on interest in the vandalism on his property.

b)  The cost of $93 is not an issue because she has no grounds.  It is just fluff to her inflated claim.

c)  On November 20, 2013 Westberg states she sent the APD Police Report to Nancy Balin = Westberg has confessed that she has communicated with Balin at that moment in time prior to Gene Mueller’s misguided permission.

d) Westberg requests that Balin represent her = a violation of RCW 36. 27.060 Private practice prohibited in certain counties – Deputy Prosecutors, IE Government attorneys cannot engage in the private practice of law outside the government.

e) On 11/20/13, it is clear Westberg has already engaged Nancy Balin in the private practice of Westberg’s defense in violation of RCW 36.27.060.

f)  Westberg has had 5 days communicating with her mother (admitted) and Nancy Balin (admitted).

 ——– Original message ——–

From: “Westberg, Jenee” <Jenee.Westberg@kingcounty.gov>
Date: 11/20/2013 14:49 (GMT-08:00)
To: “Mueller, Gene” <Gene.Mueller@kingcounty.gov>,”Frederiksen, Glynis”
<Glynis.Frederiksen@kingcounty.gov>,”Pedersen, Megan”
<Megan.Pedersen@kingcounty.gov>,”Alberg, Norm”
<Norm.Alberg@kingcounty.gov>,”Hagen, Brittany” <Brittany.Hagen@kingcounty.gov>
Cc: “Russell, Shelby” <Shelby.Russell@kingcounty.gov>,”Anderson, Tim”
<Tim.Anderson@kingcounty.gov>
Subject: urgent please read immediately

Good afternoon,

I have been recently faced with a serious and possibly life threatening situation that is a direct result from me performing my duties as a ACO for RASKC. I received a disturbing phone call last Friday from a detective with Auburn pd. The detective informed me that Jason Markley (who was convicted of animal cruelty 1st degree, the case was from 2011) has accused me of attempting to murder his family and vandalizing his property. The detective told me that the allegations were completely unfounded but he had a concern for my safety. The exact words from detective Wickman were “You need to watch your back, this guy is a real nut case and he has a lot of your personal information.”

While picking up the police file from Auburn pd, Officer T. Harris spoke to a different officer who had initially been in contact with Markley and his comment was “he is a functional whack job!” The report is available for any of you to review upon request I will be happy to send it to you.

After reviewing the file report I can completely understand why the police officers placed such labels on Mr. Markley. The statements which Markley provided to the police are rather disturbing, completely untrue, but extremely frightening that such thoughts even exist in his mind.

I do not know what this person is capable of or what his next plan is but detective Wickman said that Markley won’t be happy with the results of his investigation and he can almost guarantee that Markley won’t stop there.

I feel that my life is in great danger!

This has made myself and my family extremely afraid for our safety, this person has my DOB, social security number, current address as well as every previous address that I have ever had, my father and step mothers address, my personal phone number, and my vehicle license plate #’s. He has contacted 3 other individuals 2 of which also have animal cruelty convictions 1st and 2nd degree and the 3rd person is Laurie Hart who has not been convicted at this time the case is still pending.

I went to the court house yesterday and got the paperwork for an anti harassment order, I would rather have a protection order but since Markley hasn’t directly contacted me I’m not eligible. The harassment order is $93.00 which I don’t feel that I should have to pay out of my own personal pocket. I have sent the police report to Nancy Balin for her to review and I would like to request that she represent me and assist me in the filing of this paperwork. I would also like to request that the county purchase me a bullet proof vest immediately.

I’m also open to ANY suggestions of other ways to protect myself which I haven’t thought about so please do not hesitate to send them my way. I have disabled all of my social media pages. There is no point in changing my name because it is all public records, aside from leaving the state or country I’m fresh out of ideas. I hope you all view this matter as serious because it is and as I said you are welcome to view the report from Auburn if you think I’m over reacting and I guarantee it will completely change the way you view the situation and you to will fear for my life.

Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter in advance,

Jenee Westberg
Animal Control Officer #47
Regional Animal Services of King County
21615 64th ave s
Kent, Wa. 98032
Cell (206) 214 8388
Fax (206) 205 8043

 ____________________________________________________________

First known contact by Auburn Police => Friday, November 15, 2013

“Professional courtesy “ call from APD Det. Wickman to Jenee Westberg… NOT to her RASKC supervisor , Director Gene Mueller.

From: Russell, Shelby
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 2:25 PM
To: Mueller, Gene; Anderson, Tim; Wheatley, Aaron; Harris, Tom; Kranig, Gary; Yoshizumi, David; McLaren, Pam; Nickelson, Steve; Norberg, Marc; Cronin, Michael
Subject: Beware Jason Markley

An FYI for all field staff. Jenee just advised me she’s been contacted by Auburn PD regarding a complaint filed by a “citizen” convicted of 1st degree cruelty claiming Jenee is stalking him. The police officer advised Jenee to watch her back because this guy, Jason Markley (P038305) is a “nut case”. We are working on getting a photo of his to include in his person screen.

Shelby Russell
Animal Control Field Sergeant
206-296-3958
____________________________________________________________________

THE DEVIL’S IN THE DETAILS or SO THEY SAY…..

Below is the interview that Brittney Hagen Crosser conducted on the serial vandalism charges after learning about it from Westberg.  (See above)  It was done about mid stream of the above drama.

In this interview by Brittney Hagen Crosser.  They are typically done under oath.

Westberg admits she was stalking Markley. It was done six days after the Auburn Police Department Det. Wickman called Westberg regarding her being named as a person of interest in the Markley serial vandalism case that nearly cost Markley’s family their lives.

 Note the misspellings of “Janee” for “Jenee.”  Misspellings are a device to thwart word searches by public information officers doing public records searches.

 Jenee Westberg’s misrepresentations are corrected in red through cross referencing public records to her interview.   Westberg’s fabrications here are a form of perjury and criminal.
_______________________

Janee (Jenee) Westberg
 11/21/13. 10:43am 

Shelby Russell-AGOC Representative (present in room for Westberg)

2011 maybe April 4th, (it was April 8th) she (Westberg) went to his (Markley) location after receiving a complaint about a skinny horse house.

The call came from the call center, there were two calls actually (one of which was fictitious and both of which were suppressed and concealed at trial by KCDPA Gretchen Holmgren). Afternoon, towards the end of the day.

It wasn’t as late as he (Markley) said. It was before Reeber (Reber – mispelling = protecting Reber Ranch) closed, they close at five (Reber closes at six. Time is important because Westberg’s whole testimony was based on concealing that she switched her GPS enabled computer with ACO Aaron Wheatley to make it appear as though she was home when she was still at the Markley property terrorizing the family the evening of April 8th.   Westberg’s GPS data definitely contradicts Westberg’s story.  This is where Westberg’s GPS places her exactly:
After terrorizing Darryl and Gina Lindsey in Enumclaw earlier that day,  Westberg is with ACO Dave Morris (who illegally wrote the probable cause on both cases).  Westberg leaves Lindsey’s property where she spends several hours doing something other than animal control.
She goes 750 feet off road for about 3 minutes then spends most of the afternoon on Roberts-Black Diamond Road, stopping and starting for 4 – 6 minutes at a  time, on her way back towards Markley’s property located in Auburn.
She files one phony animal control report while driving on Roberts-Black Diamond Road close to that address prior to arriving.
It appears to be a rigged call in IE, an “Activity Report” as she is never is within visual sight of the reported address though she hangs around for about 20 minutes at a King County DOT parking lot most of that 20 minutes.
When she is in Auburn heading towards’ Markley’s property, she files a second phony “Activity Report”   at 4:56PM on Markley and Thomas prior to reaching their property – while driving.  She then “arrives” at Markley and Thomas’s property 3 minutes later at 4:59PM (almost 5PM) after traveling approx. 400 feet.
Westberg leaves Markley’s property at 5:54pm (almost 6PM) and goes to Reber Ranch (in separate vehicles meeting Thomas to buy moldy hay).  Westberg arrives at Reber Ranch at 5:57PM..  It appears while Thomas is buying moldy hay, Westberg trades her GPS enabled computer with her co-conspirator colleague ACO Aaron Wheatley who lied under oath (perjury) at Markley and Thomas’s trial to corroborate Westberg’s version of her story.  Westberg’s GPS enabled computer is turned off at 6:02PM at Reber Ranch.
Westberg’s GPS computer then miraculously turns itself back on at 8:25PM, 2 hours and 23 minutes later located at Westberg’s home in Renton while she is clearly still busy terrorizing Markley, Thomas and children still located on their property in Auburn until around 9:30PM.
She doesn’t know if it’s a modular, bright blue, surrounded by a solid cedar fence with a gate across the driveway (not accurate, good portion of fencing is wire) They came and met her at the gate. He and his wife, Cherrish (Cherish – protecting her too as it appears now Cherish Thomas aka Cherish Carita was in on the deal unbeknownst to her husband  Jason Markley – something commonly found in these cases).  She introduced herself and why she was there. They were looking at the horse in the driveway and then they started talking to her about the horse. Horse was brown (the color is “sorrel” the color of a bright copper penny.  Anyone  knowledgeable about horses would know the proper color identification of a horse.  “Brown” is not an identifiable DNA color. “Brown” was employed because the horse “Alex” was going to be “bait ‘n switched with another horse of a different color, IE,“Mr. Pibb” who was a liver chestnut) and it looked like a skeleton. (Old elderly animals get bony just like old elderly people) It was the skinniest horse she has ever seen. (lie-perjury)
They talked for a while and the horse came over and put it’s head over the fence. She asked if she could touch the horse. They invited her into the property. (Testimony from the family of six claim JW patted her gun in order to gain access to the property then she seemed to have a drug fit in their driveway. Other cases claim that Westberg used a gun/”muscle” to gain access illegally in attempt to collect manipulated “evidence.”) Nobody was ever angry. (No, the entire family was terrified).  She was there to help them and to help the horse. She felt that was how they viewed her at that time.  (Westberg certainly got that wrong).  They never left the very front of the yard. (Six people claim Westberg refused to look at the plethora of feed and hay on premises). Their horse was under a leanto (covered driveway), it smelled of oil and grease (house has propane heat but this was not an accurate description – no odor.). He went back through a gate and brought her a sample of the hay to the front yard. There was no shelter besides that. (Horses do not need any shelter. They were made to be outside).
They didn’t know what they were getting into. He invited her in, (family interviews claim she patted her gun to gain access) his horse was a skeleton (23 (perjury). They talked about how he got the horses (Craiglists 3 months prior) JW said it would be to his advantage to give her an address of where they came from. (Extortion)  They told her immediately that they got the horses off Craigslist (deception) (Whose deception?). Looked at a black horse (the fat one “Hebo” JW rarely mentions) and got the other in a package deal. She felt they were lead (led) to believe that the horse looked like that because it was old. (family photos demonstrate clearly that the horse is actually very “old” – teeth placement in face shows this).  She didn’t have to ask hardly any questions. She asked them so you got them off craigslist, who, they couldn’t remember, she asked can you remember whereabouts and they said somewhere in Yelm. She suggested that they might try and get back there. She had to write up the findings and the horse was in bad shape. Nobody was ever mad.  (No just terrified). At that point they tried to call the vet and there wasn’t one available. They called 3-4, the earliest was the next day (Heather Stewart who supported the lack of shelter script and ended up embezzling from the county along with SAFE and Hannah Mueller Evergreen).   They got the horses because they thought it would be fun, but the pony bucked the kid, so the only horse they could do anything with. They were compassionate about the fact that it was sick (because JW told them it was sick and at the time they believed her credibility). Once they realized. First they talked to the vet and the vet suggested to get the better hay for overnight. (In court testimony Stewart claims she did not look at any of the feed or four types of hay on premises). They didn’t have a vehicle to haul hay. She showed how to mix the hay so the horse didn’t get sick. They followed JW to Reeber (Reber) ranch and purchased Hay (Westberg insisted on going to Reber Ranch while GPS shows that Wheatley likely exchanged his GPS enable computer with hers at Reber while Cherish was distracted in the store and Westberg secured moldy hay from the back). She helped them transport the hay back to the house. There was a vet appoint for the next day. They seemed like a nice couple. She then left.
 The next time was the next day. He (Markley) called her after the vet had been out. He asked if there was any way for us to assist him in placing the horses. They weren’t able to sustain the cost of the recovery (that was being manufactured for them needlessly) and didn’t realize what bad shape the horses were in. (Because Heather Stewart was gouging and had already collected $250 for the farm call – did not perform any procedures to justify that amount – while failing to note that “Alex” was very old – Stewart is either dishonest or incompetent).  She had to figure out and didn’t have an answer right away. She called him back and let him know she could take them in.  Aaron Wheatley and JW went out to his house.  (2 only one in bad shape (Hebo)). They did not enter the property.  She corrects this, she did have to go into the property and get the other horse on a halter (fat Hebo who was located in the remaining 5 acres of the pasture that Westberg claimed was eaten down to nothing – a “script” Westberg uses in virtually all her cases – true or fiction). The other horse was out there already. They walked the horses from there to Reeber (Reber) Ranch after he signed the owner surrender. (There is NO evidence that the horses were ever at Reber Ranch. No invoices, no GPS, no photos of “Barn D.” However invoices indicate the horses were actually transported to Ben and Gera Dobbins ranch about five miles away) Then they went back to get the truck, (That she had parked in such a way to block the gate so that no one could drive out of the road to watch them) she did not see him at this time. The kids were sad. The female (Cherish – keeping her name out) wasn’t there. She felt like they were just doing what they needed to do.

 For three of four days she went to care for them (deception) (this is an interesting observation given it appears that neither Chelsea Eykel nor Jenee Westberg went to Reber to feed Alex and Hebo – because they were never located there.  Invoices show both horses were located at Ben and Gera Dobbins for nearly three years while Markley and Thomas were prosecuted for another horse that Jamie Taft/Bonnie Hammond of Save a Forgotten Equine (SAFE) and King County’s favorite “expert” veterinarian Hannah Mueller Evergreen were billing King County for all at the same time). Chelsea also went out there and did some stuff regarding nurturing them back to health. CE (Chelsea Eykel) arranged for the horse to be sent to Dr. Hanah (Hannah) Mueller and then to safe haven (AKA Save a Forgotten Equine to create another revenue stream for the kickbacks on taxpayer dollars). No actually that was the old horse, (admission Alex is old) the other went to foster care.

 She did see the horse one other time because he was at a foster home in Auburn (Ben and Gera Dobbins whose invoices for that year were concealed and suppressed in Gretchen Holmgren’s storage file box until July of 2016) and she saw the healthy horse. She has seen pictures of the older horse. Who is now called Mr. Pibb (The bait n switched horse for Markley’s old horse, “Alex.”  Westberg is now admitting her participation in the switch). She remarks all they (Mueller or SAFE take your pick) did was feed him (Because Hannah Mueller Evergreen and Jamie Taft/Bonnie Hammond of SAFE had queued (starved) Mr. Pibb up to be emaciated for the photo opts at Hannah’s locale in Monroe for the press). She saw him on TV after the court case, Safe Rescue (Save a Forgotten Equine-SAFE – protecting SAFE with yet another alias) was on one of the news channels (KOMO TV Denise Whitaker did two “hit” pieces on Markley – Whitaker has since gone on to become the Seahawks main party gal reporter). This is all second hand information, her other half googled “Jason markley” last weekend. She didn’t actually hear Markley. She told him to not do anything like that ever again. She doesn’t want anyone to think she was stalking that person (because she was – and here she was caught red-handed). She thinks he did this because she told him what was going on. She doesn’t think he actually did the google himself, he had told his family.

 Then when they went to trial, she had to testify and she saw him (before she testified) several times during the trial in the courthouse, they never spoke. She felt like he was glaring at her during her testimony “staring at me the whole time.” At one point his wife (again protecting Cherish), she smiled at her during the trial and said “hi.”  JW responded back “hi” and smile. She thinks maybe she got on the stand twice. She sat in the hallway a lot. She isn’t sure if it was before or after she testified the second time.

They had a hearing about whether or not she (Westberg) had trespassed on the property (while KCDPA Gretchen Holmgren was concealing the legal decision in the Lindsey case that suppressed the evidence that Westberg “unlawfully” too k resulting in a dismissal.  Prosecutorial misconduct – withholding exculpatory evidence ). He glared at her every time she saw her.

If you read the police report, he said (Markley and four of the family members) she patted her gun and trespassed and then held them hostage. She doesn’t carry a gun (Westberg patting her gun and/or using “muscle” to gain access got two other cases dismissed). That came up earlier and they took a photo of her duty belt. She had a radio and a badge. She doesn’t own a gun.

He was charged with animal cruelty (Due to Westberg’s fabrications and falsifying her reports). She thinks he views this as her fault.

She felt bad that they were charged because they got the horse in poor condition. But they never came up with someone else to charge. It wasn’t her fault.

She has not dealt with him at all except what she just told me.

On November 15th a police officer, a detective (no name but is was APD  Det. Wickman)  from auburn, (called Westberg – left this out to conceal who called who.  They must not have thought their emails would be asked for in a public record request) to say he had been investigating her and wanted to let her know. He said they hadn’t found anything. He asked her if she knew Markley, she said yes there was a cruelty case and the APD said he had been investigating her and threat everything was unfounded, but he wanted to let her know that the guy was a nutcase (something APD Det Wickman would deny several days later). He didn’t feel that Markley was going to be happy that the APD did not find anything with Janee (Jenee) and that he would likely do something. He apologized as a fellow colleague to be investigating her (professional courtesy). She said Markley had accused JW as trying to kill his whole family. She states “you have read the report so.”

 JW came back to the shelter and told GM (RASKC director Gene Mueller) and SR (ACO Shelby Russell). She told them what she told me (Brittany Hagen). The PD (Det. Wickman) had contacted her and he (Markley) was on her radar, at this point she hasn’t gotten all the details. The PD didn’t say anything about murder; she read that in the report. The PD said she had cut his brake lines, but that’s not what was in the report.

 She carried on with her day (doing everything in her power to discredit Markley). That night she told her stepmother (Ann Westberg who works for Dan Clark, chair of the Brady Committee. This is the committee that failed to name Jenee Westberg as a Brady office in 2008.) She told her she should take this seriously, sTM (stepmother) works for prosecuting attorney. JW then emailed Nancy Balin (who is barred as a government attorney to represent as defense for Jenee Westberg in a private criminal case). NB left her an email and then they spoke on Saturday. NB relayed that she has been through similar stuff and she should alert the neighbors, NB told her to not park her truck in her house. NB told her to have the county come and check her house to see if it was secure enough. (Nancy Balin orchestrated a drama to disguise any perception that Jenee was guilty).

 On Monday Tom Harris got her the police report. She didn’t get it until Tuesday. She had spoke with TH on either Friday or Monday. She told him exactly what she told everyone else. Markley has filed complaint against her and it was unfounded. (Not so much as it would turn out in just a few more disclosures below).

She wouldn’t have thought that her life was in danger if she hadn’t been contacted by the police. She was now concerned about the fact that she was a subject of the report (because she IS guilty).

Then she went to the PAO and got a anti-harassment (no she didn’t), she went to several offices and got the paperwork and began filing that out. When her shift ended she asked her mom (who is now using her position in the prosecutor’s office to protect her daughter) to look over the police report and harassment order. (There was never an anti harassment order filed because there were no grounds) She told her at that time she should let the higher-ups know (That would be Dan Clark, Mark Larson and Dan Satterberg). She also said she should contact NB and ask if she could get representation for the anti -harassment order (While Nancy Balin violated state law representing Jenee while being paid by King County). JW gave a copy of the request to her stepmother (Ann Westberg) to take to her bosses (Dan Clark, Mark Larson and Dan Satterberg). She now voices concerns that the information she is giving me during this interview maybe subject in public disclosure and then could be requested by Markley. (It was requested by the investigative reporter who gave it to Markley)

 TH got a picture for her yesterday.

 Volunteer Efforts

 No volunteer efforts.

 No fosters.

 No donations.

 Private Facebook, but she has 300 friends.

 She got rid of the Facebook page altogether (because the defense in Markley and Thomas’s trials were using her abusive radical animal rights comments to impeach her – Westberg commented that all animal abusers should be beaten to death).

 No other contact with regard to animals.

 Her sister just purchased a house across the street from Markley in April. (Westberg’s sister does not live across the street from Markley. Sister did not purchase a house in April Jenee did.  Jenee’s house is 5 miles away from Markley. There is no “street.” It is an undeveloped dirt road easement dead end.) She doesn’t know Markley She has probably been to her sister’s home about 10 times. (Westberg just admitted to being at Markley’s property 10 times about the same amount of times Markley claims his property was vandalized.) She is sure doesn’t know Markey (apparently Westberg does know Markley – very well – through her stalking and trespassing).

Sooooo…..Mr. Satterberg and Mark Larson – Just how long are  you going to carry this stage show on?  The evidence is crystal clear.  By not addressing restitution for what the criminals did to innocent people on your watch, you are exponentially more guilty.  There is more.

The more you wait – the worse it will become… for everyone.

By the way?  We have evidence and we know where the kickbacks are… that will be coming up soon. 

You people should be ashamed letting your people rape and pillage your own constituents and then stealing from the taxpayer coffers of King County on top of it.

Shame on the you, shame.

 

“When honor and the Law no longer stand on the same side of the line, how do we choose[?]” Anne Bishop

UPDATED: Maliciously prosecuted by King County Washington Prosecutor’s Office using a convicted drug addict and Brady Cop, also a King County Animal Control Officer, Jenee Westberg, Jason Markley files a Personal Restraint Petition citing gross constitutional violations by King County Prosecutor’s Office 

160616markleyprplinkedanne  Left_Arrowclick to left to view Petition

160902markleyprpsupplforannLeft_Arrow click to view Supplement

exhbitsLeft_Arrow click to view exhibits


Three months ago, the Gold Bar Reporter broke the following corruption scandal involving the several King County Prosecutors.  In total, the Gold Bar Reporter uncovered 23 animal abuse scams involving two known King County Brady Cops, Robin Cleary and Jenee Westberg. Both Clearly and Westberg have been fired for fraud and misconduct.


red-sea

 Stand firm. And he raised his staff over the King County sea of corruption and the sea parted… 

Then Washington State Bar criminal defense counsel Kevin Tarvin changed his mind and let the sea swallow up his clients…

Do you have any idea how big this is? Says defense counsel Kevin Tarvin for Jason Markley…

King County government officials committing RICO offenses against property owners to distress the property in favor of developers.

160601AllCompromisedParcels


When Washington State attorney Kevin Tarvin ( Tarvin) first noticed King County animal control officer, Jenee Westberg in court, she had obviously gained an unhealthy amount of weight since he viewed her online photos he grabbed. Her body was bulging its way out of her King County Animal Control uniform at every seam.

Her teeth were stained badly and deteriorating. Her hair was dry and un-kept. Tarvin knew these symptoms well. He had, decades ago, directed his practice to defending DUI’s and drug offenses mostly in district court. Most of his clients were addicts. If anyone knew, Tavin did.

At one time, Tarvin was a young promising prosecutor in the City of Kirkland with a shining career ahead of him. But a political scandal had him abandoning that path. He was accused of breaching the privacy of the defendant’s home using photo “evidence” that was taken of a political sign through an un-curtained window with a zoom lens… in the privacy of an innocent person’s home.

While that was a long time ago, Kevin was staying out of politics now. And he did that for years, as far as he could, even though as a devote Mormon it meant dealing with defending drug addicts. He was making a good living traveling to little district court “cattle calls” all over the state defending the non-descript clients who gladly pay him $1,000 – $2,000 a pop to keep them out of jail for their night boozing and drugging on the town.

Somehow Tarvin and his officemate Gene Piculell managed to reel in a nice married couple accused of animal cruelty from another attorney. How that happened was sketchy and smelled fishy but each of them had a client and all the same evidence to use. Double the case revenue with half the effort.

When Tavin first saw Westberg that day in person, it was unmistakable. She was using drugs.

Like any good defense attorney, he headed straight for the computer in his office. He searched for Jenee Westberg in the district court dockets listed online. Viola! Two hits! His intuition and experience were spot on.

King County Deputy Prosecutor Gretchen Holmgren’s star witness King County Animal Control Officer Jenee Westberg had been felony arrested for shoplifting at the Kent Kmart and attempted bribery of a police officer with the $500 she had in her purse in 2006. She lied repeatedly to the police prompting a second search of her purse revealing more theft she had lied about having. She pled guilty. This means there was a conviction. Inexplicably, the judge gave her a pass. The case was deferred – meaning it would be dismissed if she stayed out of trouble for 12 months. (To Westberg that means not getting caught because she was a career criminal and that career was going strong at that point).

In 2008, Westberg was felony arrested again. This time it was even more spectacular, a 19-count drug arrest. It’s called VUCSA, Violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act.

According to the police report Westberg, through her sometime incoherent drug super, lied repeatedly to the Black Diamond Police just as she did in the shoplifting case two years earlier. This time it was the perfect storm. She was driving impaired, smoking a full pipe of pot, no insurance, no registration, someone else’s car, wet empty alcohol containers in the back, and a plethora of illegal drugs – including Oxycodone – in pharmaceutical containers that did not have her name on them.

She refused a field sobriety test two months before it would have meant a license revocation.   Refusing a field sobriety test as a King County employee was also was grounds for immediate termination and she was guilty of animal cruelty – she had her little dog in the car getting exposed to her drug smoking with her during her DUI.   The irony of it.

However there was a problem. At the time, she was slotted to give testimony in some 15 cases of animal cruelty for the King County Prosecutor’s Office.

After carefully placing her badge in plain view of Police Officer Huff because Westberg didn’t have her license on her, she attempted to convince Officer Huff to give her “professional courtesy.” Huff wasn’t going for it. Jenee got arrested.

Her supervisor, ACO Steve Courvion was called to come get her dog while the K-9’s alerted on the door panels and the car doors were dismantled. Jenee was placed in the back seat of Huff’s patrol car where she passed out still handcuffed. Office Huff took her photograph. Huff spent a great deal of time explaining to Courvion that there would be no professional courtesy.

This whole event was a bit problematic for Dan Satterberg and his King County prosecutors since Westberg was their main squeeze for alleging phony allegations of animal cruelty on innocent people so they could raid them of their animals, financially disable them then steal their properties.

Westberg was their primary witness. They had spent year training her through her mother Anne Westberg and her boss KCDPA Dan Clark. Westberg knew just how to phony up the photo evidence cropping the photos so that she could testify to something that didn’t exist. Westberg had been trained well by her boss ACO Dave Morris and Hope for Horses Jenny Edwards, Satterberg’s pet “experts” who were faces for animal rights extremeists Susan Michaels from Pasado’s Save Haven. Westberg knew exactly how to take photos somewhere else then testify that it was the defendant’s property, She even photographed different horses and would claim that those were the original horse.

Of course Tarvin didn’t know any of this at the time. Tarvin thought he had it in the bag. He would be a hero… like Moses parting the sea. King County Deputy Prosecutor Gretchen Holmgren (yes that’s Seahawk’s coach’s youngest) was caught in a spectacular – very public – bonafided Brady violation.

[Brady information is when the prosecutor is supposed to hand over any “exculpatory” information on the case. (“Exculpatory” means evidence that tends to prove the innocence of the person they are prosecuting). This was based on a case known as Brady vs. Maryland thus a Brady violation if the prosecutor fails to bring it up and is caught.] – It’s a very big deal.

Tarvin was very excited. He immediately demanded Gretchen turn over the Westberg case files.   After all it was King County who prosecuted Westberg for the VUSCA drug case four years earlier.

Tarvin wrote a scathing email to KCDPA Gretchen Holmgren. Gene Piculell, (Tarvin’s officemate defending Markley’s wife) followed up with another rather lengthy and angry diatribe).  It was a historic breach that created such a chasm in the waters of the King County, the earth trembled. The shaking could felt in China. They were both incensed and accused Gretchen of being ”casual” and “cavalier” with his client’s lives.

TarvinPiculellHolmgrenEmailThreadREWestberg_Page_3

TarvinPiculellHolmgrenEmailThreadREWestberg_Page_2TarvinPiculellHolmgrenEmailThreadREWestberg_Page_1

And indeed Gretchen was. She was a woman without a soul. The apple doesn’t fall to far from the tree it seems.

exhbits-1_page_1

exhbits-1_page_2

But what Tarvin and Piculell did not know at the time was that Westberg was untouchable. That came straight from the top. Tarvin, who had been so successful at keeping out of his former prosecutor loop, didn’t get the memo.

Pages from exhbits_Page_1.jpg

Westberg’s mother, Ann Westberg, worked for Dan Clark who was the Criminal Chief Deputy Prosecutor at the Regional Justice Center. Clark was (and is still) also the chair of the “Brady committee” who decides what officer gets put on the Brady list… or not. (This is a list of people who can’t be trusted to tell the truth under oath). Somehow Westberg never made the list. It was now 2012.

Gretchen Holmgren got Tarvin’s demand for Westberg’s Brady data as she did the previous counsel a year earlier from Markley’s former counsel. At this point according to other sources, it appears Gretchen, in a panic, called public defender Dave Roberson, the man around town who likes high profile. He was the defense version of the “fixer.”

 

He had been called in to take a case from a public defender who was about to expose the phony animal cruelty case with Westberg a month earlier because the defendant was busy digging up fraud in the case. In that case, Roberson moved quickly and successfully suppressed every piece exculpatory of evidence including the video tape of the event taken of the incompetent veterinarian Hannah Mueller Evergreen and Jenee Westberg creating phony photo evidence.

Roberson threw the case.   In fact, at the time of Kevin Tarvin’s discovery of Westberg’s criminal background Roberson had just finished throwing his client under the bus in concert with King County Deputy Prosecutor, Maggie Nave – his King County prosecutor counterpart “fixer” prosecutor in front of Judge Jim Rogers.

In Roberson’s case, the background information about Westberg came after the fixed trial and tampered jury found her guilty. Roberson’s client was facing sentencing.

It was at that sentencing that Roberson disclosed the Brady violation to the court from Markley’s case. While King County Deputy Prosecutor Maggie Nave passively stood there agreeing with Roberson, she denied knowing anything about Westberg’s Brady issues.

Apparently Nave just “forgot” to mention she was the lead prosecutor who arranged Westberg’s guilty plea in 2008, concealing Westberg’s 19-count felony arrest, secreting Westberg’s nefarious employment sanctions, while she hid the third criminal misdemeanor that mysteriously disappeared mid docket (Ann Westberg was the supervisor in charge of IT in court records) that would have quelled the plea deal in front of Judge Mariane Spearman – wife of Court of Appeals Judge Michael Spearman.

Judge Michael Spearman would soon sit on the Court of Appeals panel for both cases and would protect his wife instead of justice for the wrongfully accused.

Maggie also was the architect behind the free pass of animal sex advocate James Tait, the man who led Kenneth Pinyan to his death having sex with a horse in a well-known brothel in Enumclaw in 2005 when Dan Satterberg was busy suppressing the fact there is full bore a animal sex trade going on right under the public’s noses.

Satterberg would tell the public that no charges beyond criminal trespass were possible for Pinyan because there were no anti-bestiality laws on the books at the time – or so Satterberg said… but…

What about the “murder” part? Did we all forget about the “murder” part? A man died! Apparently Maggie and Satterberg forgot about that little part in the heat of facilitating Tait’s move to stardom in the pro bestially movie “ZOO” about Pinyan’s practices and subsequent death.  They had full confessions of the two men who accompanied Pinyan into that barn where he met his death. They were running an animal sex brothel and often videotaped the “experience.” Sources say there are doctors, lawyers and high level politicians who have participated in this and paid five figures to do it.

When Gretchen called Roberson in a panic, Roberson kicked it into high gear. Roberson called Tarvin and apparently “convinced” Tarvin it would be in his best interests not to impeach Westberg with those police records while Tarvin was zealously defending his client Jason Markley.

Tarvin would have to find another way. Tarvin claimed he was told that he may see a woman claiming fraud in her own animal cruelty case at some time (Roberson didn’t mention it was his own client seeking justice). She’s just crazy; pay no mind to that man behind the curtain. Markley would recall that Tarvin repeated that message to him repeatedly while sharing that Roberson bragged he used to date Senator Maria Cantwell. (Roberson apparently has an archetype of women he likes).

Meanwhile Roberson is attempting to control his rather frisky client (the “crazy” lady) who knew she had been played. He would have to disclose the Westberg breach to her now that Tarvin had already parted the waters in what surely would have put a stop to Westberg’s siege at the hands of her bosses, in the Markley case.

And just like that, Tarvin recanted. The seas ebbed and his clients were swallowed up along with a real change in their family life of their four young children.

Meanwhile Roberson refused to let his client examine the Westberg case files documents he had received from Holmgren for another 3 months ensuring she would have little recourse to find the Markley case that was going to trial mid December. At her sentencing in late November Roberson then made a circular legal argument that Westberg wasn’t really “convicted” and he himself was to blame for not checking (inadequate assistance of counsel) in front of the judge. Roberson threw himself on the sword.

After three weeks of repeatedly telling his client that it was Gretchen Holmgren who had advised him of her own Brady violation, Roberson now recanted and told the court (Jim Rogers) that it was Maggie Nave who disclosed Westberg’s Brady issue and that Maggie didn’t know anything about it until Tarvin exposed it in the Markley case. This became a bit problematic when it was exposed that Westberg’s 19-count felony arrest was Maggie’s own case that she knowingly gave Westberg a free pass on.

When Tarvin got the Roberson call, he did exactly what he was told. He threw the case. This was the moment his office mate Gene Piculell went ballistic. Gene’s client was Markley’s wife. She ended with a hung jury in her favor 9-3. The bench, that is, Cheryl Carey, arranged to convict Markley the day before the jury verdict that her bailiff was reporting to her. The next day Judge Patrick Oshsi would replace Carey attempting to get a mistrial on the record when the jury came midsentence reporting a hung jury 9 -3 in favor of the defendant.

In addition to the $25,000 Markley gave Tarvin, Markley gave Tavin $3,000 to take him to the Court of Appeals, and to stay Markley’s jail time and community service, something Markley was entitled to. Tarvin took the money then didn’t stay the case. Markley had no choice but to report to jail. Tarvin kept the money then visited Markley in his last few days of jail asking where his children were. Markley fired him.

Then the strangest thing happened. The “crazy lady” showed up at Tarvin’s office. Only it turns out she wasn’t so “crazy.” She was an investigative reporter. Apparently that part was missed when she got targeted. And this tenured investigator was on the scent. She found Tarvin and talked with him for several hours.

Tarvin sang like a canary. He didn’t know why everyone said Westberg wasn’t really “convicted.” He’s been doing criminal law for decades and she pled guilty. That is a conviction. He didn’t mention the fact he failed to impeach Westberg with the evidence of those convictions he had in front of the jury. In fact he had her employment records with two “Loudermill” sanctions for dishonesty at the time. In addition to the arrests and convictions, she had been sanctioned for dishonesty and theft of county time on other unrelated instances (plus about 30 other police events he didn’t know about yet). Tarvin attempted to get the employment Loudermill sanctions into the record outside of the jury while Judge Carey attempted to give them erroneous exhibit numbers that would “hid” them from the court record.

The “crazy” lady then went down to the Regional Justice Center to review the Markley case file. She discovered the digital photo of the “after” horse. It had visited Adobe Photoshop CS3 for MAC. It was also a different color than the original horse “Alex.” Clearly a bait’n switch had occurred. She called Tarvin. He was ready and singing more. She told him she had just been reviewing the Markley case file.

Tarvin got very nervous. He first spent 20 minutes explaining his defense strategy. He sounded panicked. He said sometimes an attorney sacrifices the opportunity for impeachment just in order to win. (The audio of the trial doesn’t see it that way. He threw the case and the judge helped him).

After a lengthy explanation, she had her turn.  She asked him about the photos of the horse. “Did anyone notice it was a different color?”

Tarvin answered that he had been raised on a farm for 20 years. He certainly was familiar with the DNA color identification of a horse.

“Well then you knew…”

Tarvin then blurted out in desperation, “Do you have any idea how big this is?!”

Well no Kevin I don’t. Why don’t you explain it?

Since, it has been uncovered that it is indeed a massive RICO ring. Top dog appears to be King County Prosecutor Dan Satterberg. Hard to fight that one. Tarvin knew and succumbed to the pressure. So Kevin Tarvin stood by and helped an innocent functioning young family be swallowed up and cannibalized by a RICO cartel.   He even kept the money they paid him to protect them. The sea swallowed them up.

That’s how big it is… It only takes one person Kevin – to save the hundreds since that Satterberg’s office has persecuted and stolen from. It could have been you.

 

 

“When honor and the Law no longer stand on the same side of the line, how do we choose[?]” Anne Bishop

Do not be afraid. Stand firm. And he raised his staff over the King County sea of corruption and the sea parted… 


Then  Washington State Bar criminal defense counsel Kevin Tarvin changed his mind and let the sea swallow up his clients…

Do you have any idea how big this is? Says defense counsel Kevin Tarvin for Jason Markley…

King County government officials committing RICO offenses against property owners to distress the property in favor of developers.

160601AllCompromisedParcels


When Kevin Tarvn ( Tarvin) first noticed King County animal control officer, Jenee Westberg in court, she had obviously gained an unhealthy amount of weight since he viewed her online photos he grabbed. Her body was bulging its way out of her King County Animal Control uniform at every seam.

Her teeth were stained badly and deteriorating. Her hair was dry and un-kept. Tarvin knew these symptoms well. He had, decades ago, directed his practice to defending DUI’s and drug offenses mostly in district court. Most of his clients were addicts. If anyone knew, Tavin did.

At one time, Tarvin was a young promising prosecutor in the City of Kirkland with a shining career ahead of him. But a political scandal had him abandoning that path. He was accused of breaching the privacy of the defendant’s home using photo “evidence” that was taken of a political sign through an un-curtained window with a zoom lens… in the privacy of an innocent person’s home.

While that was a long time ago, Kevin was staying out of politics now. And he did that for years, as far as he could, even though as a devote Mormon it meant dealing with defending drug addicts. He was making a good living traveling to little district court “cattle calls” all over the state defending the non-descript clients who gladly pay him $1,000 – $2,000 a pop to keep them out of jail for their night boozing and drugging on the town.

Somehow Tarvin and his officemate Gene Piculell managed to reel in a nice married couple accused of animal cruelty from another attorney. How that happened was sketchy and smelled fishy but each of them had a client and all the same evidence to use. Double the case revenue with half the effort.

When Tavin first saw Westberg that day in person, it was unmistakable. She was using drugs.

Like any good defense attorney, he headed straight for the computer in his office. He searched for Jenee Westberg in the district court dockets listed online. Viola! Two hits! His intuition and experience were spot on.

King County Deputy Prosecutor Gretchen Holmgren’s star witness King County Animal Control Officer Jenee Westberg had been felony arrested for shoplifting at the Kent Kmart and attempted bribery of a police officer with the $500 she had in her purse in 2006. She lied repeatedly to the police prompting a second search of her purse revealing more theft she had lied about having. She pled guilty. This means there was a conviction. Inexplicably, the judge gave her a pass. The case was deferred – meaning it would be dismissed if she stayed out of trouble for 12 months. (To Westberg that means not getting caught because she was a career criminal and that career was going strong at that point).

In 2008, Westberg was felony arrested again. This time it was even more spectacular, a 19-count drug arrest. It’s called VUCSA, Violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act.

According to the police report Westberg, through her sometime incoherent drug super, lied repeatedly to the Black Diamond Police just as she did in the shoplifting case two years earlier. This time it was the perfect storm. She was driving impaired, smoking a full pipe of pot, no insurance, no registration, someone else’s car, wet empty alcohol containers in the back, and a plethora of illegal drugs – including Oxycodone – in pharmaceutical containers that did not have her name on them.

She refused a field sobriety test two months before it would have meant a license revocation.   Refusing a field sobriety test as a King County employee was also was grounds for immediate termination and she was guilty of animal cruelty – she had her little dog in the car getting exposed to her drug smoking with her during her DUI.   The irony of it.

However there was a problem. At the time, she was slotted to give testimony in some 15 cases of animal cruelty for the King County Prosecutor’s Office.

After carefully placing her badge in plain view of Police Officer Huff because Westberg didn’t have her license on her, she attempted to convince Officer Huff to give her “professional courtesy.” Huff wasn’t going for it. Jenee got arrested.

Her supervisor, ACO Steve Courvion was called to come get her dog while the K-9’s alerted on the door panels and the car doors were dismantled. Jenee was placed in the back seat of Huff’s patrol car where she passed out still handcuffed. Office Huff took her photograph. Huff spent a great deal of time explaining to Courvion that there would be no professional courtesy.

This whole event was a bit problematic for Dan Satterberg and his King County prosecutors since Westberg was their main squeeze for alleging phony allegations of animal cruelty on innocent people so they could raid them of their animals, financially disable them then steal their properties.

Westberg was their primary witness. They had spent year training her through her mother Anne Westberg and her boss KCDPA Dan Clark. Westberg knew just how to phony up the photo evidence cropping the photos so that she could testify to something that didn’t exist. Westberg had been trained well by her boss ACO Dave Morris and Hope for Horses Jenny Edwards, Satterberg’s pet “experts” who were faces for animal rights extremeists Susan Michaels from Pasado’s Save Haven. Westberg knew exactly how to take photos somewhere else then testify that it was the defendant’s property, She even photographed different horses and would claim that those were the original horse.

Of course Tarvin didn’t know any of this at the time. Tarvin thought he had it in the bag. He would be a hero… like Moses parting the sea. King County Deputy Prosecutor Gretchen Holmgren (yes that’s Seahawk’s coach’s youngest) was caught in a spectacular – very public – bonafided Brady violation.

[Brady information is when the prosecutor is supposed to hand over any “exculpatory” information on the case. (“Exculpatory” means evidence that tends to prove the innocence of the person they are prosecuting). This was based on a case known as Brady vs. Maryland thus a Brady violation if the prosecutor fails to bring it up and is caught.] – It’s a very big deal.

Tarvin was very excited. He immediately demanded Gretchen turn over the Westberg case files.   After all it was King County who prosecuted Westberg for the VUSCA drug case four years earlier.

Tarvin wrote a scathing email to KCDPA Gretchen Holmgren. Gene Piculell, (Tarvin’s officemate defending Markley’s wife) followed up with another rather lengthy and angry diatribe).  It was a historic breach that created such a chasm in the waters of the King County, the earth trembled. The shaking could felt in China. They were both incensed and accused Gretchen of being ”casual” and “cavalier” with his client’s lives.

TarvinPiculellHolmgrenEmailThreadREWestberg_Page_3

TarvinPiculellHolmgrenEmailThreadREWestberg_Page_2TarvinPiculellHolmgrenEmailThreadREWestberg_Page_1

And indeed Gretchen was. She was a woman without a soul. The apple doesn’t fall to far from the tree it seems.

But what Tarvin and Piculell did not know at the time was that Westberg was untouchable. That came straight from the top. Tarvin, who had been so successful at keeping out of his former prosecutor loop, didn’t get the memo.

Westberg’s mother, Ann Westberg, worked for Dan Clark who was the Criminal Chief Deputy Prosecutor at the Regional Justice Center. Clark was (and is still) also the chair of the “Brady committee” who decides what officer gets put on the Brady list… or not. (This is a list of people who can’t be trusted to tell the truth under oath). Somehow Westberg never made the list. It was now 2012.

Gretchen Holmgren got Tarvin’s demand for Westberg’s Brady data as she did the previous counsel a year earlier from Markley’s former counsel. At this point according to other sources, it appears Gretchen, in a panic, called public defender Dave Roberson, the man around town who likes high profile. He was the defense version of the “fixer.”

He had been called in to take a case from a public defender who was about to expose the phony animal cruelty case with Westberg a month earlier because the defendant was busy digging up fraud in the case. In that case, Roberson moved quickly and successfully suppressed every piece exculpatory of evidence including the video tape of the event taken of the incompetent veterinarian Hannah Mueller Evergreen and Jenee Westberg creating phony photo evidence.

Roberson threw the case.   In fact, at the time of Kevin Tarvin’s discovery of Westberg’s criminal background Roberson had just finished throwing his client under the bus in concert with King County Deputy Prosecutor, Maggie Nave – his King County prosecutor counterpart “fixer” prosecutor in front of Judge Jim Rogers.

In Roberson’s case, the background information about Westberg came after the fixed trial and tampered jury found her guilty. Roberson’s client was facing sentencing.

It was at that sentencing that Roberson disclosed the Brady violation to the court from Markley’s case. While King County Deputy Prosecutor Maggie Nave passively stood there agreeing with Roberson, she denied knowing anything about Westberg’s Brady issues.

Apparently Nave just “forgot” to mention she was the lead prosecutor who arranged Westberg’s guilty plea in 2008, concealing Westberg’s 19-count felony arrest, secreting Westberg’s nefarious employment sanctions, while she hid the third criminal misdemeanor that mysteriously disappeared mid docket (Ann Westberg was the supervisor in charge of IT in court records) that would have quelled the plea deal in front of Judge Mariane Spearman – wife of Court of Appeals Judge Michael Spearman.

Judge Michael Spearman would soon sit on the Court of Appeals panel for both cases and would protect his wife instead of justice for the wrongfully accused.

Maggie also was the architect behind the free pass of animal sex advocate James Tait, the man who led Kenneth Pinyan to his death having sex with a horse in a well-known brothel in Enumclaw in 2005 when Dan Satterberg was busy suppressing the fact there is full bore a animal sex trade going on right under the public’s noses.

Satterberg would tell the public that no charges beyond criminal trespass were possible for Pinyan because there were no anti-bestiality laws on the books at the time – or so Satterberg said… but…

What about the “murder” part? Did we all forget about the “murder” part? A man died! Apparently Maggie and Satterberg forgot about that little part in the heat of facilitating Tait’s move to stardom in the pro bestially movie “ZOO” about Pinyan’s practices and subsequent death.  They had full confessions of the two men who accompanied Pinyan into that barn where he met his death. They were running an animal sex brothel and often videotaped the “experience.” Sources say there are doctors, lawyers and high level politicians who have participated in this and paid five figures to do it.

When Gretchen called Roberson in a panic, Roberson kicked it into high gear. Roberson called Tarvin and apparently “convinced” Tarvin it would be in his best interests not to impeach Westberg with those police records while Tarvin was zealously defending his client Jason Markley.

Tarvin would have to find another way. Tarvin claimed he was told that he may see a woman claiming fraud in her own animal cruelty case at some time (Roberson didn’t mention it was his own client seeking justice). She’s just crazy; pay no mind to that man behind the curtain. Markley would recall that Tarvin repeated that message to him repeatedly while sharing that Roberson bragged he used to date Senator Maria Cantwell. (Roberson apparently has an archetype of women he likes).

Meanwhile Roberson is attempting to control his rather frisky client (the “crazy” lady) who knew she had been played. He would have to disclose the Westberg breach to her now that Tarvin had already parted the waters in what surely would have put a stop to Westberg’s siege at the hands of her bosses, in the Markley case.

And just like that, Tarvin recanted. The seas ebbed and his clients were swallowed up along with a real change in their family life of their four young children.

Meanwhile Roberson refused to let his client examine the Westberg case files documents he had received from Holmgren for another 3 months ensuring she would have little recourse to find the Markley case that was going to trial mid December. At her sentencing in late November Roberson then made a circular legal argument that Westberg wasn’t really “convicted” and he himself was to blame for not checking (inadequate assistance of counsel) in front of the judge. Roberson threw himself on the sword.

After three weeks of repeatedly telling his client that it was Gretchen Holmgren who had advised him of her own Brady violation, Roberson now recanted and told the court (Jim Rogers) that it was Maggie Nave who disclosed Westberg’s Brady issue and that Maggie didn’t know anything about it until Tarvin exposed it in the Markley case. This became a bit problematic when it was exposed that Westberg’s 19-count felony arrest was Maggie’s own case that she knowingly gave Westberg a free pass on.

When Tarvin got the Roberson call, he did exactly what he was told. He threw the case. This was the moment his office mate Gene Piculell went ballistic. Gene’s client was Markley’s wife. She ended with a hung jury in her favor 9-3. The bench, that is, Cheryl Carey, arranged to convict Markley the day before the jury verdict that her bailiff was reporting to her. The next day Judge Patrick Oshsi would replace Carey attempting to get a mistrial on the record when the jury came midsentence reporting a hung jury 9 -3 in favor of the defendant.

In addition to the $25,000 Markley gave Tarvin, Markley gave Tavin $3,000 to take him to the Court of Appeals, and to stay Markley’s jail time and community service, something Markley was entitled to. Tarvin took the money then didn’t stay the case. Markley had no choice but to report to jail. Tarvin kept the money then visited Markley in his last few days of jail asking where his children were. Markley fired him.

Then the strangest thing happened. The “crazy lady” showed up at Tarvin’s office. Only it turns out she wasn’t so “crazy.” She was an investigative reporter. Apparently that part was missed when she got targeted. And this tenured investigator was on the scent. She found Tarvin and talked with him for several hours.

Tarvin sang like a canary. He didn’t know why everyone said Westberg wasn’t really “convicted.” He’s been doing criminal law for decades and she pled guilty. That is a conviction. He didn’t mention the fact he failed to impeach Westberg with the evidence of those convictions he had in front of the jury. In fact he had her employment records with two “Loudermill” sanctions for dishonesty at the time. In addition to the arrests and convictions, she had been sanctioned for dishonesty and theft of county time on other unrelated instances (plus about 30 other police events he didn’t know about yet). Tarvin attempted to get the employment Loudermill sanctions into the record outside of the jury while Judge Carey attempted to give them erroneous exhibit numbers that would “hid” them from the court record.

The “crazy” lady then went down to the Regional Justice Center to review the Markley case file. She discovered the digital photo of the “after” horse. It had visited Adobe Photoshop CS3 for MAC. It was also a different color than the original horse “Alex.” Clearly a bait’n switch had occurred. She called Tarvin. He was ready and singing more. She told him she had just been reviewing the Markley case file.

Tarvin got very nervous. He first spent 20 minutes explaining his defense strategy. He sounded panicked. He said sometimes an attorney sacrifices the opportunity for impeachment just in order to win. (The audio of the trial doesn’t see it that way. He threw the case and the judge helped him).

After a lengthy explanation, she had her turn.  She asked him about the photos of the horse. “Did anyone notice it was a different color?”

Tarvin answered that he had been raised on a farm for 20 years. He certainly was familiar with the DNA color identification of a horse.

“Well then you knew…”

Tarvin then blurted out in desperation, “Do you have any idea how big this is?!”

Well no Kevin I don’t. Why don’t you explain it?

Since, it has been uncovered that it is indeed a massive RICO ring. Top dog appears to be King County Prosecutor Dan Satterberg. Hard to fight that one. Tarvin knew and succumbed to the pressure. So Kevin Tarvin stood by and helped an innocent functioning young family be swallowed up and cannibalized by a RICO cartel.   He even kept the money they paid him to protect them. The sea swallowed them up.

That’s how big it is… It only takes one person Kevin – to save the hundreds since that Satterberg’s office has persecuted and stolen from. It could have been you.

 

%d bloggers like this: