President of Washington State Bar Association resigns hours before criminal warrant issued

“When honor and the Law no longer stand on the same side of the line, how do we choose[?]”  Anne Bishop


FireShot-Screen-Capture-015-Board-of-Governors-Biographies-webcache_googleusercontent_com_search_qcache_gUwwyQXP36AJ_www_wsba_org_About-WSBA

On June 23, 2017, Washington State Bar Association’s (WSBA) President Robin Lynn Haynes was notified of pending criminal charges for theft.

Some of you may not have known this since the  Seattle Times (Washington’s most circulated newspaper) assisted the WSBA by not reporting.

In 2015, the Gold Bar Reporter contacted Seattle Times Editor Mike Carter, after having ample evidence that WSBA Hearing Officer Lin O’ Dell was using a convicted killer, Mark Plivilech, to steal from O’Dell’s elderly clients, but instead of reporting on WSBA O’Dell theft and fraud, Seattle Times Editor Mike Carter wrote ” Who cares.”

With no surprise, the biggest story involving WSBA corruption, President of WSBA resigns after her arrest warrant is issued, and the Seattle Times does what any embedded ( reporters who are spoon fed stories to look the other way on behalf of advertisers) journalist would do, not report the real news.

img003240_Page_01

Not only was WSBA Hearing Officer Lin O’ Dell found guilty of stealing from her clients using a convicted killer to harass them inside their homes, the duo also  unlawfully diverted money to Mark Plivilech, a convicted killer, and Lin O’Dell’s fraudulent companies. Companies the duo started so that Lin O’ Dell could transfer client’s money from the elderly person’s trust account to pay Mark Plivilech and mafia friends to make home repairs on elderly clients homes ( many who are over 80 and bed ridden).

In December 2013, Judge Monasmith Steven County Washington found Lin O’Dell guilty of trust embezzlement. The WSBA has yet to take any disciplinary action against O’Dell ( June 24, 2017).

From sources, the WSBA received twelve complaints against Lin O’Dell over the last twenty years for stealing and the WSBA broomed every single one.  An insider from the WSBA said ” it’s common knowledge that lead counsel Linda Eide worked with Lin O’Dell inside the guardian scam” hence why so many complaints were dismissed.

Since 1993, attorney Lin O’Dell has been stealing from Washingtonians, almost all elderly and vulnerable adults. In one case from Pierce County, the Simpson case, the daughter who was caring for her father ended up dead, their house burnt down and a Caboose was stolen by Lin O’ Dell.

Over the last four years, we found at least ten clients Lin O’Dell has been stealing from and committing SSA fraud ( diverting clients SSA funds into her own bank account).  One fact is clear, Lin O’Dell and Mark Plivilech didn’t steal by themselves, they had a lot of help, including one Spokane County Commissioner, one Spokane County Superior Court Judge, one Stevens County Superior Court Judge, and one Dr Zimmerman ( who fled to Denton Texas once we started reporting on Lin O’Dell’s fraud).

However, WSBA Hearing Officer Lin O’Dell didn’t steal without the assistance of the Washington State Bar Association, and the Washington State Supreme Court.

Joe Patrice, a reporter with “Above the Law” wants to know ” What in the World is going on in Washington?”   Joe its simple, the WSBA has been taken over by scammers and fraudsters to further their agenda ( stealing with no accountability).

The 39-year-old Robin Haynes, who last year became the youngest lawyer to hold the President position.   Gonzaga Law School brags that she is a mentor.  This begs a question: Is Ms. Haynes teaching racketeering 101 or how to steal with the assistance of the WSBA?


Sadly Ms. Haynes has been replaced by WSBA Brad Furlong who has ties to more WSBA criminals, Geoffrey Gibbs and his co-conspirators Lin O’Dell ( Gibbs and O’Dell scammed taxpayers out of thousands on the Snohomish County Housing Authority scam of Whispering Pines).

Robin Haynes is well connected with Supreme Court Justices Debra Stephens, Barbara Madsen, Mary Yu and Mary Fairhurst. So much so that Haynes funneled public monies to their campaigns.   The next time our readers decided to contribute to Justice for All, think twice.

 

AdvancedSearch_ContributionsData_contributeeA-vert-1

FireShot-Screen-Capture-019-Advanced-Search-Detailed-Contributions-web_pdc_wa_gov_MvcQuerySystem_AdvancedSearch_ContributionsData_contribute

IMG_1503

How we know this is simple: Robin Haynes bragged about it on her Instagram account.

IMG_1505-Copy

Robin Haynes “brags” she is a at a backyard Barbie Q with WA State Chief Supreme Justice Mary Fairhurst. Perhaps Justice Fairhurst has never heard of Judicial Ethics Cannon Rules, Appearance of Fairness?

 

IMG_1511-Copy

above Robin Haynes and WA Supreme Court Justice

IMG_1516-Copy

above Robin Haynes and WA Supreme Court Justice Barbara Madsen

IMG_1503

above Robin Haynes and WA Supreme Court Justice Mary Yu


 

So Joe Patrice, you ask ” What in the World is going on in Washington State? ‘ Well it’s called racketeering, fixing cases, forging and withholding evidence to ensure convictions, fraud, and WSBA elite few members stealing with the assistance of the WSBA Office of Disciplinary Counsel ( Linda Eide and Doug Ende).

Washingtonians need not worry but we’re going to abolish the Washington State Bar Association. They are making criminals out of non-criminals and we must do everything in our power to stop them with as much sunshine as possible.  Stay tuned.


STOP CORRUPTION NOW

If you look at great human civilizations, from the Roman Empire to the Soviet Union, you will see that most do not fail simply due to external threats but because of internal weakness, corruption, or a failure to manifest the values and ideals they espouse.

Cory Booker

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech” Benjamin Franklin

People who inspire others activism are this World’s greatest gifts to mankind.  Nelson Mandela once said “Education is the most powerful weapon which can be used to change the World.”

Now for those of my readers who know me, know beyond any shadow of doubt that my God is not the all mighty dollar, she’s a non-tangible item, and her name is “ Justice.”

Justice is not something one can purchase nor is it something that can be described by people who view the all mighty dollar as proving one’s accomplishments in this World.

Justice is something that I hold heavy on my heart, especially when I see government officials spiting and trampling on the rights of the accused or citizens who have little or no resources to fight back.  Sad for the powers that be, my publishers made sure that I don’t have to think about money for some time.

Justice means holding the criminals accountable, and not abusing the power granted to you by the State.  Justice requires sacrifice and doesn’t come without sweat, hard work, years and years of demands, hardships, and has no price tag.

When I think of  Justice I think of John F. Kennedy’s speech “Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.”

There are things in the World worth fighting for, especially the First Amendment.  The First Amendment is the one tangible item on this planet that separates America from the rest of the World.

In America, Free Speech has little boundaries. Outside of threatening a person’s life, it cannot be stopped. It’s a train on a one way track, too large and too heavy for just one man or judge to stop.

“Freedom of speech is a principal pillar of a free government: When this support is taken away, the constitution of a free society is dissolved,” Benjamin Franklin.

Last week I said to a friend of mine, ” We are entering an era of corruption that I don’t see an end to.  An era that spits on the First Amendment like its a piece of toilet paper and I’m not sure if there’s any hope for America”  for which she said ” there’s one solution to corruption, its transparency.”   How right she is.

Every one of us had or still have childhood heroes.  Obviously,  I, as a female, cherish Elizabeth Cady Stanton as the Founding Mother of Women’s Rights Convention ( movement).


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seneca_Falls_Convention

 

The Seneca Falls Convention was the first women’s rights convention.[1] It advertised itself as “a convention to discuss the social, civil, and religious condition and rights of woman”.[2] Held in Seneca Falls, New York, it spanned two days over July 19–20, 1848. Attracting widespread attention, it was soon followed by other women’s rights conventions, including the Rochester Women’s Rights Convention in Rochester, New York, two weeks later. In 1850 the first in a series of annual National Women’s Rights Conventions met in Worcester, Massachusetts.

The convention was seen by some of its contemporaries, including featured speaker Mott, as one important step among many others in the continuing effort by women to gain for themselves a greater proportion of social, civil and moral rights,[3] while it was viewed by others as a revolutionary beginning to the struggle by women for complete equality with men. Stanton considered the Seneca Falls Convention to be the beginning of the women’s rights movement, an opinion that was echoed in the History of Woman Suffrage, which Stanton co-wrote.[3]

The convention’s Declaration of Sentiments became “the single most important factor in spreading news of the women’s rights movement around the country in 1848 and into the future”, according to Judith Wellman, a historian of the convention.[4] By the time of the National Women’s Rights Convention of 1851, the issue of women’s right to vote had become a central tenet of the United States women’s rights movement.[5] These conventions became annual events until the outbreak of the American Civil War in 1861.


Without the First Amendment, the Seneca Falls Convention would not have taken place, and I wouldn’t have been allowed to earn a Juris Doctorate.  I shall never forget that the avenue to Women’s Civil Rights was the First Amendment.

When I was sworn in as a lawyer, I took an oath to protect the Constitution against all foreign invaders, both domestic and foreign, regardless of whether it’s the Washington State Bar Association, other lawyers, Judges, prosecutors, political officials, or a police officers, I shall not and never will stop defending the rights of all Americans, lawyers and non-lawyers alike, to speak, write, protest, blog, report, or investigate.

 


One of my favorite 21st Century philosophers is UCLA Law Professor Eugene Volokh who wrote the following statement:

I keep hearing about a supposed “hate speech” exception to the First Amendment, or statements such as, “This isn’t free speech, it’s hate speech,” or “When does free speech stop and hate speech begin?” But there is no hate speech exception to the First Amendment. Hateful ideas (whatever exactly that might mean) are just as protected under the First Amendment as other ideas….

Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/05/07/no-theres-no-hate-speech-exception-to-the-first-amendment/?utm_term=.e6585f9ae699


 

The Free Press Clause protects publication of information and opinions, and applies to a wide variety of media. In Near v. Minnesota (1931) and New York Times v. United States (1971), the Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment protected against prior restraint—pre-publication censorship—in almost all cases. The Petition Clause protects the right to petition all branches and agencies of government for action. In addition to the right of assembly guaranteed by this clause, the Court has also ruled that the amendment implicitly protects freedom of association.

 

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution


Imagine if a government official knocked on your door and demanded you take down your Donald Trump for President sign, or said ” Contacting a public official is harassing” or ‘booing the Vice President in a public theater was harassing, and was allowed to use the court systems to attack your First Amendment protected speech rights. A one time ludicrous thought, seems to be a common theme to trying to SLAPP down free speech rights of your opponents.

I for one will not stand idle while anyone tramples on the First Amendment. Hence is why I filed Block v WSBA et al. ( US Federal Court Seattle).   The day I sit idle while an association issues an illegal subpoena for Gold Bar Reporter files in violation of the First Amendment is the day I take my last breath on this planet.

The Gold Bar Reporter is self funded 100 years past my death and shall remain so long as the First Amendment does.

The United States has entered a dark and gloomy time in its history, which I hope is never repeated by the next generation.  Martin Luther King, Alice Paul, and Elizabeth Cady Stanton would be quite ashamed of where America is today. On the other hand, Adolf Hitler would be quite proud.


“Always stand on principle….even if you stand alone.”

– John Adams


Washington State Supreme Court Justice Barbara Madsen failed constitutional law



On October 11, 2016, several citizens involved with the “Reformed Washington State Bar Association” protested the Washington State Legislature’s refusal to address the Washington State Bar’s racketeering offenses against Washingtonians.

Activists had three copies of the U.S Constitution, delivering one signed copy to Governor Jay Inslee, one copy to Attorney General Bob Ferguson, and one copy to Washington State Supreme Court Justice Barbara Madsen with the following words ” a gift for you, because its clear you lost your copy!”



 

constitution-clipart-constitution

Today we are pleased to announce the public release of a Writ of Mandamus and proposal for a new lawsuit for racketeering and civil rights conspiracy.

In April 2016, Washington State Supreme Court Justice Barbara Madsen and former law clerk Ron Carpenter collectively conspired to destroy records at the Supreme Court. After Ron Carpenter was caught destroying records, he resigned and immediately left Washington State.

The complaint  centers around public officials in Gold Bar, Snohomish County Washington, and the Washington State Bar Association conspiring to harm the Gold Bar Reporter’s news source because we exposed at least six of Washington State’s top corrupt officials including Aaron Reardon, Kevin Hulten, Jon Rudicil, Mark Roe, and John E Pennington.

The Writ of Mandamus was filed in United States District Court, 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

writLeft_Arrow click to the left for a copy of Writ filed against Madsen.

The complaint documents the greatest assault on freedom of the press in the history of the United States.

Anne Block has achieved a degree of notoriety in Snohomish County as the only reporter in the state to break a story involving corruption at the highest levels of government in Snohomish county. Chief Executive Reardan was forced to resign after a story published in the Gold Bar Reporter revealed that Reardan used taxpayer funds to finance affairs with two women employees. According to the complaint, Anne Block even had receipts to show airline tickets purchases, hotel receipts and receipts for sex toys used in Europe during the affair.

According to the complaint, before Reardan resigned, he assigned two employees to organize a “false flag” operation against Block, by having the employees pose as disinterested observers with aliases to organize a campaign to disbar Block. He had another employee destroy county records to hide the affairs. That employee was eventually convicted of destroying evidence. As a result of the evidence being destroyed, an Island County prosecutor concluded that he did not have enough evidence to prosecute Reardan for misuse of public funds.

In enlisting support for the bar complaints, the false flag operation gained the support of two other Block targets. John Pennington had been attacked in the press by Anne Block and other newspapers such as the Seattle Times and the Everett Herald as being unqualified to hold the position of emergency operations director of Snohomish County. According to a study conducted by the IRS, John Pennington received his college degree from a diploma mill which sold the degrees at a flat rate. According to the RICO complaint, Block published stories how Reardan acted on Pennington’s advise in allowing houses to be built on the Oso mudslide site even though professional engineers described the site as unsafe. The mudslide that eventually occurred resulted in the deaths of 43 citizens.

John Pennington was terminated as result of his criminal conduct. Last week, the State of Washington had to pay out $60,000,000.00 ( yes Million) as a result of John Pennington’s criminal negligent conduct in the Oso mudslide .

John Pennington could not sue directly because he is a public official, so he turned to a personal friend at the Washington State Bar Linda Eide to have Block disbarred for reporting on John Pennington’s incompetence and police documented criminal activity.

The false flag operation also enlisted the support of public officials in Gold Bar Washington, Joe Beavers and Linda Loen, who had their own problems with Block. Block had initiated a public disclosure suits when the town officials refused to turn over documents related to the theft of the towns funds.

According to the complaint, town officials illegally diverted approximate 20% of the town’s budget to finance a campaign to discredit Block. This included planting defamatory and false information on an online BlogSpot the Penningtons helped set up in 2006 titled the Sky Valley Chronicle, to advocate residents physically assaulting, stalking, and intimidating Block supporters, and further assaulting and stalking two city council members until they resigned for supporting Block.

Members of the RICO enterprise even published verbal threats in local newspapers to murder Block if she showed up at City Council meetings.

According to Block, WSBA officials fixed the case against her by pre-selecting a hearing officer Lin O’Dell to guarantee conviction.  Ms. O’Dell was caught using her convicted killer boyfriend Mark Plivilech to intidate ther elderly clients and was cited by Judge Monasmith in Stevens Court Superior Court for stealing from her client and breaching her ethical duties. Instead of getting disbarred for stealing from her client, O’Dell managed to get herself assigned to hear a non-client political appointee’s complaint against Block for her news reports with no client.

Public United States Post Office records confirm that Lin O’Dell and her convicted killer boyfriend Mark Plivilech set up a post office box three blocks from John Pennington’s home in Duvall Washington for purposes paying off Lin O’Dell to ensure a conviction against Block. O’Dell and Plivilech live in Cheney Washington, a four hour drive from Duvall to Cheney.

In October 2016,  WSBA Hearing Officer was charged and plead guilty to stealing clients fund and laundering client’s trust accounts to her husband who was convicted of an execution style murder.  Lin O’Dell”s defense was ” I didn’t know I was married to a convicted killer for 12 years defense.”

The Washington State Bar has no jurisdiction to regulate free press nor get involved with any issues of a personal nature. But Washington State Bar counsel and friend to John E Pennington Linda Eide violated Block’s civil rights and issued an illegal subpoena for Block’s Gold Bar Reporter files.  Block told Linda Eide ” go get a subpoena! Media Shield and First Amendment protects news reporters and authors from turning over any file without a court order. Go pound sand!”

According to Block’s Writ of Mandamus, the WSBA chief hearing officer pre-selected a business associate, Lin O’Dell who had formed a partnership with a convicted killer Mark Plivilech ( Bar hearing officer Lin O’Dell’s partner of choice)  to form a construction company that profited from the Oso building site.

Public emails sent from Lin O’Dell further documents that she used her killer boyfriend Mark Plivilech to intimidate vulnerable. Plivilech illegally used their social security information to gain access to their credit, and in several of O’Dell’s clients ( mainly elderly) Plivilech a convicted killer was managing O’Dell’s clients accounts.

According to the Washington State Attorney General a convicted killer is not allowed to have access to vulnerable adults. Background checks on Plivilech document that over ten of O’Dell’s elderly clients accounts were compromised by Mark Plivilech and attorney Lin O’Dell.  Since Block broke this story, Plivilech has fled to the Placentia California area.

According to two witnesses, the hearing officer prevented Block from participating at her hearing by muting out the phone connection through which Block had appeared because of her hearing disability. Washington Bar records retrieved under the public records release also confirm  O’Dell and Eide did this intentionally to prevent Block from participating in the hearing.  Then, the hearing officer concluded that Block should be disbarred for not participating.
According to Block’s complaint, what happened to her is typical of the practices in violation of Sherman Anti-Trust and racketeering laws committed against its members by the Washington State Bar Association.

Since 1992, the Washington State Supreme Court has come under heavy criticism from the American Bar Association in three separate studies over 40 years for delegating its disciplinary activities to the WSBA, a practice the ABA likens to putting the fox in charge of the hen house.

According to the complaint, Washington is one of the few remaining states that put its bar association in charge of lawyer discipline, with the result that Washington has one of the lowest charging rates of attorney discipline in the nation. The complaint charges that attorney discipline is focused almost entirely on sole practitioners, minorities and enemies of the WSBA leadership. According to the complaint, 44% of all attorney discipline comes out of Snohomish County. Block charges the reason this occurs is that two WSBA officials in Snohomish County improperly use their influence to direct discipline toward their opponents. Block charges that these two officials improperly contacted the Gold Bar City Council, illegally provided them with confidential information, in violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct and the rules regarding enforcement of lawyer discipline before there were any bar complaints even filed. The suit also accuses one official of filing anonymous complaints to conceal the fact that he is improperly influencing the cases.

As a result of the information contained in her complaint, Block is demanding a federal grand jury investigation concerning the misuse of public funds by her opponents and the denial of her civil rights.

Block will be in Olympia this session demanding that the Washington State Legislature “abolish” the corrupt Bar and place all disciplinary proceedings in the hands of ” we the people.”


 

Writ of Mandamus, 9th Circuit 

writ_page_01writ_page_03

writ_page_04

writ_page_05

writ_page_06

writ_page_07

 writ_page_08

writ_page_09

writ_page_10

writ_page_11

writ_page_12

writ_page_13

writ_page_14

writ_page_15

writ_page_16

writ_page_17

writ_page_18

writ_page_19

writ_page_20

writ_page_21

writ_page_22

writ_page_23

writ_page_24

writ_page_25

writ_page_26

 

writ_page_27

writ_page_28

writ_page_29

writ_page_30

writ_page_31

writ_page_32

Washington State Bar Association, to be abolished over felonious conduct

Late last summer, the Gold Bar Reporter was first to break a story about the Washington State Bar Association’s dropping the word ” association.”

Our source, an insider close to Supreme Court Justice Barbara Madsen stated ” the WSBA is trying to come up with a plan to push liability off on Washington State taxpayers, because it’s clear that the Bar is going to lose Scannell v WSBA et al. and Block v WSBA et al. over felonious racketeering and anti-trust violations. ”

We just learned that Washington State Bar  Association has officially voted to drop the word association, in an effort to push liability of 50 Million plus onto Washington State taxpayers, instead of pushing liability to its’ members the above two cases.

In Block’s cases, public records from Snohomish County and the United States Post Office documented that John Pennington ( man who killed 43 people in the Oso mudslides, only suspect in the rape of 5 year old girl from Cowlitz County Washington, and is now working for Pierce College), set up a post office box in Duvall Washington to pass  financial bribes to attorney Lin O’Dell and her convicted killer boyfriend  Mark Plivilech, while at the same time, John Pennington is the  man, according to the lead detective on a Cowlitz  County case from 1992, the man who is responsible for the rape of a 5 year old girl.   Instead of suing Block, John Pennington enlisted his friend Linda Eide, Washington State Bar’s lead counsel, and Washington State Bar Board member Geoffrey Gibbs, to go after Block, a journalist who held a WSBA Bar license, for reporting on John Pennington criminal conduct.

In John Scannell ‘s case, Washington State Bar counsel members Scott Bugsby and Linda Eide tried to gain access into John Scannell’s attorney client files in an effort to go after a Board member’s political foe and Scannell’s client Paul King.

A source said ” The Bar knows that once you two win, you’re coming after them personall to collect damages, starting with members of the WSBA Office of Disciplinary Counsel.”


Washington State Bar’s letter to its members

 

IMPORTANT – if you want the WSBA to continue as your professional association, you should attend one or more of three upcoming meetings at the Seattle WSBA offices, discussed more completely below:

  • Public meeting of the WSBA Bylaws Workgroup on August 8
  • Special Meeting of the BOG on Aug 23
  • Regular Meeting of the BOG on Sept 29/30.

I attended the WSBA BOG meeting Friday in Walla Walla, having recently realized (through my work on theSections Policy Workgroup) that the BOG is now starting to implement a comprehensive series of sweeping changes to (i) the WSBA Bylaws, (ii) Court Rule 12.1 and to (iii) the Bar Act.

These changes are being implemented incrementally for tactical reasons, but are designed and intended ultimately to:

  • Substantially reduce the ability of Members to influence WSBA governance – in violation of the Bar Act,
  • Eliminate the WSBA’s role as its “Members” professional association,
  • Wholly and unambiguously convert the WSBA into a public entity/government agency with the singular and exclusive mission of serving the public, and
  • Enhance and expand the scope of the Washington State Supreme Court’s influence and control over all aspects of the WSBA (including setting Member dues), not just matters relating to licensing, regulation, attorney discipline and other such areas.

These changes are part of a longer term and little known Strategic Plan that is the product of these and other key WSBA leaders:

  • Executive Director Paula Littlewood,
  • Immediate Past President Anthony Gipe,
  • President William Hyslop,
  • WSBA General Counsel Jean McElroy

The full scope of the changes and the underlying justifications for them are detailed in:

For your convenience, here’s a link to the Public Materials for the Walla Walla meeting (all 656 pages):

I then identified four of the proposed Bylaw Amendments most concerning to me:

  • First, I strongly objected to changing the name of the WSBA after 128 years to drop the word “Association,” emphasizing that this change is explicitly intended clarifythat the WSBA is not actually a professional association of attorneys. I said I thought most WSBA Members would find this highly objectionable and would be quite surprised to learn that they weren’t really part of a professional association for lawyers.
  • Second, I objected to putting the Washington Supreme Court in charge of determining members’ dues and said I thought others would too.
  • Third, I described the creation of three more appointed Board seats as undemocratic and bad from a governance perspective because appointed seats are subject to abuse by vesting too much power in the hands of too few. [Note: these changes to the BOG composition would also directly violate RCW 2.48.030of the Bar Act regarding the “Board of Governors.” The BOG is arguably illegally constituted currently based on that RCW.]
  • Fourth, I objected to giving limited license practitioners a greatly out-sized percentage of the Board seats relative to their de minimis numbers – i.e., 2 Board seats from a total of fewer than 20 limited license practitioners. [In my view, these folks should have to run within their Districts just like other Bar Members. At best they should be entitled to only a single designated seat.]

A reporter who was present at the Washington State Bar’s meeting said ” I added that I had read through the Governance Task Force Report twice in recent days and that I wasn’t too enamored with it, and that I had found much of its key analysis conclusionary and unpersuasive.”

He further stated “My comments stirred up quite a few folks, including current and former BOG members, several of whom said essentially that these issues had already been debated and discussed for a long time and that it was time to move forward with all of the recommendations in the Governance Report, including the first group of Bylaw Amendments under consideration.  These Governance Report recommendations have strong momentum. One gentleman even said he didn’t necessarily agree with the decisions made but that a lot of time and effort had going into them and it was time to start passing them because folks had done a lot of work and he wanted to see the results. So much for not being pushed into bad decisions by undue focus on sunk costs. ”

 

Mr. Gipe is currently running for King County Superior Court Position #52 – a position that could be the first step on a path to the Washington State Supreme Court, where he could ultimately exercise the control over the WSBA that he currently seeks to vest in that body. I personally feel it is very important to prevent this and thus to keep Mr. Gipe out of the judiciary. That is why I have gone to great lengths to support his opponent in the race. If you share my concerns…. Proposed Policies Eliminating or Restricting Religious (Cultural) Practices During the morning discussion of the WSBA’s proposed restrictions on religious practices, members of the Indian Law Section EC and many others from varied backgrounds advocated strongly that the Indian Law Section should be allowed to continue whatever religious and cultural practices they thought were appropriate, both for reasons of ensuring those who practice


Washington State Bar Association internal memo 

Bylaws Workgroup Report 071416 of GC Jean McElroy_Page_1.jpg

 

 

 

DRAFT Chapter VII Work Group Proposed Revisions_Page_2.jpgDRAFT Chapter VII Work Group Proposed Revisions_Page_1.jpg

 

draft-chapter-vii-work-group-proposed-revisions_page_4

draft-chapter-vii-work-group-proposed-revisions_page_3

John

A


A new lawsuit


draft-chapter-vii-work-group-proposed-revisions_page_5

Very close to breaking the largest corruption (RICO) scandal in Washington State

74497___gustavorezende___Kids_6_03

SUNSHINE in Washington State is coming!

One local news reporter said to us ” Snohomish County is screwed!”  His statement came right after records were released from Snohomish County Prosecutor’s office showing two compeling factors:

1.  In every self insured county in Washington State, there are “Nazis” who are placed in high positions, mainly prosecutors/lawyers, whose job it is to go after attorneys who question or sue government agencies; and

2.  County employee Nazi spies are all members of the WA State Bar Office of Disciplinary Council.

We are working on a very big RICO scandal involving high ranking members of Washington County government who are all connected to the Washington State Bar’s Office of Diciplinary Council.

We have a hypothesis that we’re working on, but at this stage we are confident to report that WE are going to break the LARGEST RICO SCANDAL In United States history and it will reform the Washington State Bar and every self insured agency in Washington State.

quote-corruption-is-worse-than-prostitution-the-latter-might-endanger-the-morals-of-an-individual-the-karl-kraus-104997

Snohomish County Washington; Domestic Spying

65-Free-Conceptual-Retro-Clipart-Illustration-Of-A-Curious-Man-Spying-With-Binoculars

In early 2009 when I filed a public records suit against City of Gold Bar, I had no clue that what I was about to uncover was the largest RICO scandal in Washington State history until a few months ago.

Things changed when I discovered that a Washington State Bar hearing officer’s convicted killer boyfriend Mark Plivilech set up a post office box in Duvall Washington within months after his girlfriend and a Washington State Bar Office of Disciplinary Counsel Hearing Officer Lin O’Dell was assigned to adjudicate John E. Pennington’s ( a political appointee here in Snohomish County Washington) witness statement he filed against the Gold Bar Reporters in retaliation for its (in furtherance of the Enterprise efforts) six year investigation of John Pennington’s last 30 years of crimes against women and children.

From our six year investigation we are confident to report that John E. Pennington is a pedophile, a wife beater, a child abuser, a prime suspect in a child rape case, a pathological liar, a sociopath, and his county travel records indicate that there are missing children cases that he should be investigated for in Alaska, Maryland, and Washington State.

We recently learned that the Washington State Supreme Court does not monitor the Office of Disciplinary Council members. If they had, they would have discovered what we uncovered about attorney Lin O’Dell – she’s a thief, was cited by Judge Monasmith for stealing from Paula Fowler in Stevens County, has major problems with IRS tax liens, and Spokane County records document that Lin O’Dell and Plivilech have a hell of a lot of shady businesses and are taken advantage of elderly adults. Simply put, attorney Lin O’Dell is a criminal, as is John Pennington.

“Birds of the same feathers flock together as do pigs and swine…”

How we learned that Washington State Supreme Court was not monitoring its Disciplinary Board  was very simple; Supreme Court Clerk Carpenter wrote an email letter to a concerned Washington State resident stating that the Supreme Court does not concern itself with the Office of Disciplinary Council. A legal issue that the US Supreme Court just held in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission  that if the overseers of the Board are not monitoring its Board members they open themselves up for $$$ liability. Stupid is as stupid does.

Now back to convicted killer Mark Plivilech. Mark Plivilech has never had any business dealing on this side of the state until his girlfriend who is also a WA State Bar hearing officer named Lin O’Dell was handpicked by WA State Bar Chief Hearing Officer Joseph Nappi Jr.  Mark Plivilech didn’t chose Everett for his new post office box, he chose the WSBA’s star pedophile, wife abuser John Pennington’s home city of Duvall Washington.

John and Crystal Hill Pennington live within three blocks of Plivilech’s post office of choice, located in Duvall Washington. Stellar RICO thugs we have inside Snohomish County Washington.

Now how we discovered the domestic spying ring here in Snohomish County Washington, goes back to “stupid is as stupid does.”   In 2009, John E. Pennington was charged with assaulting ( police reports confirm that Pennington kicked and punched Anne in her uterus) his 3rd trimester pregnant wife Anne in King County. Ole Johnny got sloppy in his illegal retrieval of sealed court records. In 2009 after being charged with criminal assault for the second time ( first criminal assault lead to a guilty plea in Oregon in the early 1990s), John Pennington misused his Homeland Security Clearance to access sealed criminal convictions records of his soon to be former spouse’s friend. Unfortunately, John Pennington used Snohomish County fax machines and disseminated his illegal searches into his King County divorce records.

Soon after the illegal dissemination of sealed criminal records he should not have had access to, John Pennington’s Homeland Security was revoked. But not before Pennington managed to retrieve a “ spider” of files on Gold Bar Reporter Anne Block and her family members.

According to one Gold Bar council member, John E. Pennington illegally accessed Block’s family information including her sister’s mental health records and disseminated those via email to Gold Bar’s governing body in early 2009. Further evidence of John Pennington’s domestic spying was confirmed by the Massachusetts FBI in Boston in August 2012.

Gold Bar’s former City attorney Jeffrey Myers deposition of Anne Block was telling. Instead of asking questions about what public records Anne Block had in her possession, Mr. Myers started with an improper line of questioning about whether Block had changed her name, whether she files her taxes,  how many children she had, what her income was, etc. all non-permissible questioning in a public records case.

Three months ago, the IRS confirmed that an illegal  IRS check was made on Block after she started reporting on John E. Pennington’s criminal conduct.  Cant wait to depose the IRS FOIA officer . . .

John E. Pennington is being sued under RICO after county records confirmed that he was one of many county employees posting threats to physically harm Gold Bar activist Block on his blog spot titled ” The Sky Valley Chronicle.”

What Gold Bar Reporter Block noticed from attorney Jeff Myers deposition questioning was that he was writing on the side of Block’s deposition testimony “LODS.” For those of our readers who do not understand what “LODS” means it’s an acronym for “ Lying on Deposition Statement.”

I suspect whatever attorney Jeffrey Meyers saw, he must have believed it, or as Gold Bar resident Noel Frederck said “ he (Myers) wanted to believe it

So sorry Jeffrey Myers, but Block has never been treated at a mental health facility nor has she ever been treated for mental health issues of any kind. But she does know someone close to her that has been.

Did you know that retrieval and dissemination of mental health records in Massachusetts is a felony? Did you know that Mass laws prohibit the retrieval and dissemination of mental health records by anyone including medical doctors? Stupid is as stupid does!

As for me, I believe that people who do have mental health problems have an absolute right to privacy that should not be evaded simply because a relative who lives 3,000 miles away exercises her legal right to access John Pennington’s email communication in 2009.

And just how a sister and brother of mine in Mass got involved, we’re working on that story . . . and let’s just say that John E. Pennington is a fuckin sociopath who belongs behind bars.

John Pennington, Joe Beavers and Crystal Hill should be extradited  back to Mass for criminal prosecution, noting that Mass Statute of Limitations toll when its out of state residents. So sad for the RICO gang; Mass has the strictest laws on disseminating mental health records ( not even doctors are permitted to disseminate mental health records).

So there you go, the story of why Gold Bar’s Mayor Joe Beavers stole over 1M dollars of water and street money to hide public records and why Snohomish County Prosecutor Mark Roe is protecting John Pennington. Criminal RICO in its finest.

And they think I’m a thorn in their sides, they haven’t dealt with my sister and her husband yet.  But they will be soon.

John Pennington will be brought to justice for his crimes regardless of whether it takes me 30 days or 30 years.  Pennington and those who assisted him in committing crimes are the real threat to a free society and must be brought to justice regardless of the time or money.  Just think of how different Our World would be today if someone exposed Adolf Hitler long before World War II.  We will not make that same mistake.

Atifete Jahjaga said:

Democracy must be built through open societies that share information. When there is information, there is enlightenment. When there is debate, there are solutions. When there is no sharing of power, no rule of law, no accountability, there is abuse, corruption, subjugation and indignation.

 

%d bloggers like this: